These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21916792)

  • 1. Comparison of two bone anchored hearing instruments: BP100 and Ponto Pro.
    Olsen SØ; Glad H; Nielsen LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 50(12):920-8. PubMed ID: 21916792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomised comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Hill-Feltham P; Roberts SA; Gladdis R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2014 Feb; 128(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 24524414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful?
    Kompis M; Kurz A; Pfiffner F; Senn P; Arnold A; Caversaccio M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15 Suppl 1():S47-50. PubMed ID: 24869443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Ponto bone-anchored hearing system.
    Westerkull P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():32-40. PubMed ID: 21389702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino.
    Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
    Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S; Erler S; Garstecki D; Dhar S
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
    Kurz A; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of model-based versus non-parametric monaural noise-reduction approaches for hearing aids.
    Harlander N; Rosenkranz T; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 22642311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
    Snapp H; Angeli S; Telischi FF; Fabry D
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.