135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21917077)
1. Ultrasound for evaluation of adnexal malignancy: from 2D to 3D ultrasound.
Hata T; Hata K; Noguchi J; Kanenishi K; Shiota A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1255-68. PubMed ID: 21917077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the placenta.
Hata T; Tanaka H; Noguchi J; Hata K
Placenta; 2011 Feb; 32(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 21115197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Utrilla-Layna J; Alcázar JL; Aubá M; Laparte C; Olartecoechea B; Errasti T; Juez L; Mínguez JÁ; Guerriero S; Jurado M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 25270368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What do contrast media add to three-dimensional power Doppler evaluation of adnexal masses?
Sparac V; Kupesić S; Kurjak A
Croat Med J; 2000 Sep; 41(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10962043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improve the diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of adnexal malignancy?
Dai SY; Hata K; Inubashiri E; Kanenishi K; Shiota A; Ohno M; Yamamoto Y; Nishiyama Y; Ohkawa M; Hata T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 18686352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative evaluation of pelvic tumors by Doppler and three-dimensional sonography.
Kurjak A; Kupesic S; Sparac V; Bekavac I
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Aug; 20(8):829-40. PubMed ID: 11503919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of 2- and 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography for diagnosis of small adnexal masses.
Hu R; Xiang H; Mu Y; Feng Y; Gu L; Liu H
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1889-99. PubMed ID: 25336475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional power Doppler improve the preoperative evaluation of complex benign ovarian lesions.
Vrachnis N; Sifakis S; Samoli E; Kappou D; Pavlakis K; Iliodromiti Z; Botsis D
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 23444747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].
Marret H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(1 Suppl):S20-33. PubMed ID: 11917373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Three dimensional sonography and 3D power angiography in differentiation of adnexal tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Smoleń A; Bednarek W; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1061-70. PubMed ID: 12722400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early ovarian cancer: 3-D power Doppler.
Kupesic S; Plavsic BM
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 16447081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women.
Alcázar JL; Guerriero S; Laparte C; Ajossa S; Jurado M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Mar; 155(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 21211896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound for characterizing adnexal masses.
Huchon C; Metzger U; Bats AS; Bensaid C; Chatellier G; Azizi M; Lefrère-Belda MA; Dujardin A; Bernard JP; Lécuru F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 May; 38(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 22413992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasonographic features in the preoperative diagnosis of primitive fallopian tube carcinoma].
Balaya V; Metzger U; Lecuru F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Jan; 45(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 26183176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses.
Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
