392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21917103)
1. Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Mottrie A; Gallina A; De Wil P; Thüer D; Novara G; Ficarra V
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):999-1006. PubMed ID: 21917103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ficarra V; Borghesi M; Suardi N; De Naeyer G; Novara G; Schatteman P; De Groote R; Carpentier P; Mottrie A
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 23470027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical review of 'pentafecta' outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in high-volume centres.
Patel VR; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Schatloff O; Coelho RF; Valero R; Ko YH; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Chauhan S
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1007-17. PubMed ID: 21917104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.
Rocco B; Matei DV; Melegari S; Ospina JC; Mazzoleni F; Errico G; Mastropasqua M; Santoro L; Detti S; de Cobelli O
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 19426191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Porpiglia F; Morra I; Lucci Chiarissi M; Manfredi M; Mele F; Grande S; Ragni F; Poggio M; Fiori C
Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 22840353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: critical analysis of techniques and outcomes.
Gautam G; Rocco B; Patel VR; Zorn KC
Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):734-41. PubMed ID: 20579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of urinary function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Vora AA; Dajani D; Lynch JH; Kowalczyk KJ
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 23169151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.
Krambeck AE; DiMarco DS; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Myers RP; Blute ML; Gettman MT
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 18778350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Brandina R; Berger A; Kamoi K; Gill IS
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 May; 19(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 19357511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Continence outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with adverse urinary continence risk factors.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Palmer K; Patel VR
BJU Int; 2015 Nov; 116(5):764-70. PubMed ID: 25726729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Striving for Trifecta outcomes in localised prostate cancer.
Barnett C; Kumar P; Challacombe B; Dasgupta P
Minerva Med; 2011 Aug; 102(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 21959706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic and standard open radical prostatectomy: oncological and quality-of-life outcomes.
Huang KH; Carter SC; Shih YC; Hu JC
J Comp Eff Res; 2013 May; 2(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 24236628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stepwise description and outcomes of bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Friedlander DF; Alemozaffar M; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1754-60. PubMed ID: 22998904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
