These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21917218)

  • 21. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants.
    Laneau J; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 16219993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of the pitch and naturalness of popular music by cochlear implant users.
    Grasmeder ML; Verschuur CA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S79-90. PubMed ID: 26561891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
    Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
    Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.
    Anderson I; Weichbold V; D'Haese P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2002 Apr; 81(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 11987740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.
    Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(5):779-89. PubMed ID: 18816426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor.
    Seebens Y; Diller G
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 22094825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Low-frequency pitch coding: relationships with speech-in-noise and music perception by pediatric populations with typical hearing and cochlear implants.
    Dinçer D'Alessandro H; Nicastri M; Portanova G; Giallini I; Russo FY; Magliulo G; Greco A; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 38194096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Musical pitch discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Ping L; Yuan M; Feng H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 May; 121(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22724279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Music and Speech Perception in Prelingually Deafened Young Listeners With Cochlear Implants: A Preliminary Study Using Sung Speech.
    Wheeler HJ; Hatch DR; Moody-Antonio SA; Nie Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3951-3965. PubMed ID: 36179251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Limb CJ; Roy AT
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():13-26. PubMed ID: 23665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users.
    Gfeller K; Woodworth G; Robin DA; Witt S; Knutson JF
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 9201460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A review of research on music perception ability for adult cochlear implant users].
    Liu Z; Liu B; Wang S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1053-6. PubMed ID: 23379124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.