292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21917418)
1. Habitual use of vocal fry in young adult female speakers.
Wolk L; Abdelli-Beruh NB; Slavin D
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e111-6. PubMed ID: 21917418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of vocal fry in young adult male American English speakers.
Abdelli-Beruh NB; Wolk L; Slavin D
J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 24315658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occurrence Frequencies of Acoustic Patterns of Vocal Fry in American English Speakers.
Abdelli-Beruh NB; Drugman T; Red Owl RH
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):759.e11-759.e20. PubMed ID: 26547606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic, aerodynamic, physiologic, and perceptual properties of modal and vocal fry registers.
Blomgren M; Chen Y; Ng ML; Gilbert HR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2649-58. PubMed ID: 9604359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of the Use of Glottal Fry in the Spontaneous Speech of Young and Middle-Aged American Women.
Oliveira G; Davidson A; Holczer R; Kaplan S; Paretzky A
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):684-687. PubMed ID: 26427301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electroglottographic evaluation of gender and vowel effects during modal and vocal fry phonation.
Chen Y; Robb MP; Gilbert HR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):821-9. PubMed ID: 12381041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glottal contact quotient in Mediterranean tongue trill.
Hamdan AL; Nassar J; Al Zaghal Z; El-Khoury E; Bsat M; Tabri D
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):669.e11-5. PubMed ID: 22082865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electroglottographic contact quotient in different phonation types using different amplitude threshold levels.
Kankare E; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Miettinen A; Pylkkänen T
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Oct; 37(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 22432606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the perturbation of the contact quotient of the EGG waveform to analyze age differences in adult speech.
Bier SD; Watson CI; McCann CM
J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 24495426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors associated with vocal fry among college students.
Cantor-Cutiva LC; Bottalico P; Hunter E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Jul; 43(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 28805159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Judgments of Intelligence and Likability of Young Adult Female Speakers of American English: The Influence of Vocal Fry and the Surrounding Acoustic-Prosodic Context.
Parker MA; Borrie SA
J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):538-545. PubMed ID: 28958872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception of vocal tremor during sustained phonation compared with sentence context.
Lederle A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Finnegan E
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):668.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22521323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Lexical Stress on the Use of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Female Speakers.
Gibson TA
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 27091470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of fundamental frequency and voice intensity in Iranian men and women aged between 18 and 45 years.
Izadi F; Mohseni R; Daneshi A; Sandughdar N
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 21889298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Glottal Fry on Acoustic Voice Assessment: A Preliminary Study.
Plexico LW; Sandage MJ
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):378.e13-378.e17. PubMed ID: 27838283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of vocal fold vibration with an assessment form for high-speed digital imaging: comparative study between healthy young and elderly subjects.
Yamauchi A; Imagawa H; Yokonishi H; Nito T; Yamasoba T; Goto T; Takano S; Sakakibara K; Tayama N
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):742-50. PubMed ID: 22521532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The pitch rise paradigm: a new task for real-time endoscopy of non-stationary phonation.
Rasp O; Lohscheller J; Doellinger M; Eysholdt U; Hoppe U
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 16636565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
