These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21917583)

  • 1. Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures.
    Adashi EY; Wyden R
    JAMA; 2011 Sep; 306(10):1135-6. PubMed ID: 21917583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.
    Kushnir VA; Vidali A; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):736-41. PubMed ID: 23755956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology program reporting.
    Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD
    JAMA; 2011 Dec; 306(23):2564; author reply 2564-5. PubMed ID: 22187275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.
    Nangia AK; Likosky DS; Wang D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):745-61. PubMed ID: 19081563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cycle 1 as predictor of assisted reproductive technology treatment outcome over multiple cycles: an analysis of linked cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System online database.
    Stern JE; Brown MB; Luke B; Wantman E; Lederman A; Hornstein MD;
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Feb; 95(2):600-5. PubMed ID: 20643404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future.
    Williams RS; Doody KJ; Schattman GL; Adashi EY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 24813599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correct coding for laboratory procedures during assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Coding Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):808-11. PubMed ID: 22789141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Pouly JL; Larue L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17208496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.
    Doody K; Ball GD; Schattman G; Coddington C; Toner JP; Goldfarb J
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):e25. PubMed ID: 23954353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Hazout A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 17215161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technology in the USA: Is more regulation needed?
    Frith L; Blyth E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Oct; 29(4):516-23. PubMed ID: 25171854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.