These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21918453)

  • 1. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
    Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: effects of age and hearing acuity.
    Lash A; Rogers CS; Zoller A; Wingfield A
    Exp Aging Res; 2013; 39(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 23607396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Amichetti NM; Atagi E; Kong YY; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 28700448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilingualism and Speech Understanding in Noise: Auditory and Linguistic Factors.
    Skoe E; Karayanidi K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):115-130. PubMed ID: 30461397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Linguistic Context on Word Recognition in Noise by Elderly Listeners Using Spanish Sentence Lists (SSL).
    Cervera T; Rosell V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Dec; 44(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 25274285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.