BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21918634)

  • 1. LifePrint: a novel k-tuple distance method for construction of phylogenetic trees.
    Reyes-Prieto F; García-Chéquer AJ; Jaimes-Díaz H; Casique-Almazán J; Espinosa-Lara JM; Palma-Orozco R; Méndez-Tenorio A; Maldonado-Rodríguez R; Beattie KL
    Adv Appl Bioinform Chem; 2011; 4():13-27. PubMed ID: 21918634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance comparison between k-tuple distance and four model-based distances in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Yang K; Zhang L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Mar; 36(5):e33. PubMed ID: 18296485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of k-tuple length on sample-comparison with high-throughput sequencing data.
    Wang Y; Lei X; Wang S; Wang Z; Song N; Zeng F; Chen T
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Jan; 469(4):1021-7. PubMed ID: 26721429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A new alignment-free sequence analysis based on the distribution of K-tuple].
    Shen J; Wu WW; Xie XL; Guo MC; Yuan ZF
    Yi Chuan; 2010 Jun; 32(6):606-12. PubMed ID: 20566465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of functional elements in unaligned nucleic acid sequences by a novel tuple search algorithm.
    Wolfertstetter F; Frech K; Herrmann G; Werner T
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1996 Feb; 12(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 8670622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An algorithm for the DNA sequence generation from k-tuple word contents of the minimal number of random fragments.
    Drmanac R; Labat I; Crkvenjakov R
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 1991 Apr; 8(5):1085-102. PubMed ID: 1878166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Inconsistency of Maximum Parsimony for k-Tuple-Site Data.
    Galla M; Wicke K; Fischer M
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Apr; 81(4):1173-1200. PubMed ID: 30607881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An improved model for whole genome phylogenetic analysis by Fourier transform.
    Yin C; Yau SS
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Oct; 382():99-110. PubMed ID: 26151589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SSAHA: a fast search method for large DNA databases.
    Ning Z; Cox AJ; Mullikin JC
    Genome Res; 2001 Oct; 11(10):1725-9. PubMed ID: 11591649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating mutation distances from unaligned genomes.
    Haubold B; Pfaffelhuber P; Domazet-Loso M; Wiehe T
    J Comput Biol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1487-500. PubMed ID: 19803738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ENJ algorithm can construct triple phylogenetic trees.
    Hong Y; Guo M; Wang J
    Mol Ther Nucleic Acids; 2021 Mar; 23():286-293. PubMed ID: 33425487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylogenetic Invariants for Metazoan Mitochondrial Genome Evolution.
    Sankoff D; Blanchette M
    Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform; 1998; 9():22-31. PubMed ID: 11072318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Block alignment: New representation and comparison method to study evolution of genomes.
    Lanjanian H; Nowzari A; Hosseinkhan N; Nejad AM
    Genomics; 2019 Dec; 111(6):1590-1603. PubMed ID: 30445214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phylogenetic analysis of the brassicales clade based on an alignment-free sequence comparison method.
    Hatje K; Kollmar M
    Front Plant Sci; 2012; 3():192. PubMed ID: 22952468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the relationship between sequence similarity and accurate phylogenetic trees.
    Cantarel BL; Morrison HG; Pearson W
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2090-100. PubMed ID: 16891377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome analysis with inter-nucleotide distances.
    Afreixo V; Bastos CA; Pinho AJ; Garcia SP; Ferreira PJ
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 25(23):3064-70. PubMed ID: 19759198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic analysis of the env gene of HIV-1 isolates taking into account individual nucleotide substitution rates.
    Van de Peer Y; Janssens W; Heyndrickx L; Fransen K; van der Groen G; De Wachter R
    AIDS; 1996 Nov; 10(13):1485-94. PubMed ID: 8931782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.