These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21919188)

  • 1. It is time for changes in the analysis of whole effluent toxicity data.
    Diamond J; Denton D; Anderson B; Phillips B
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 21919188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test of significant toxicity: a statistical application for assessing whether an effluent or site water is truly toxic.
    Denton DL; Diamond J; Zheng L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 May; 30(5):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21305584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the test of significant toxicity for determining the toxicity of effluents and ambient water samples.
    Diamond JM; Denton DL; Roberts JW; Zheng L
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Apr; 32(5):1101-8. PubMed ID: 23400869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of effluent toxicity as an indicator of aquatic life condition in effluent-dominated streams: a pilot study.
    Diamond J; Stribling J; Bowersox M; Latimer H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2008 Oct; 4(4):456-70. PubMed ID: 18597571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of whole effluent toxicity data characteristics and use of Welch's T-test in the test of significant toxicity analysis.
    Zheng L; Diamond JM; Denton DL
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Feb; 32(2):468-74. PubMed ID: 23172744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cost/effective screening method for assessing the toxicity of nutrient rich effluents to algae.
    Carbonell G; Fernández C; Tarazona JV
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 85(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20514476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency strategic plan for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals.
    Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H; Kramer M;
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):139-62. PubMed ID: 20574895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of wastewater effluents by small-scale biotests and a fractionation procedure.
    Pessala P; Schultz E; Nakari T; Joutti A; Herve S
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2004 Oct; 59(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 15327886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between whole effluent toxicity (WET) and chemical-based effluent quality assessment in Vojvodina (Serbia).
    Teodorović I; Becelić M; Planojević I; Ivancev-Tumbas I; Dalmacija B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Nov; 158(1-4):381-92. PubMed ID: 18972215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of an integrated testing strategy to the U.S. EPA endocrine disruptor screening program.
    Willett CE; Bishop PL; Sullivan KM
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Sep; 123(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 21642633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing of sampling programmes for industrial effluent monitoring.
    Ntuli F; Kuipa PK; Muzenda E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Mar; 18(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 20853154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors in the U.S. toxics release inventory: a comparison of the life cycle impact-based and risk-based assessment tools developed by U.S. EPA.
    Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2235-40. PubMed ID: 21561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic benefits of using adaptive predictive models of reproductive toxicity in the context of a tiered testing program.
    Martin MT; Knudsen TB; Judson RS; Kavlock RJ; Dix DJ
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2012 Feb; 58(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 22239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toxicity assessment of wastewaters, river waters, and sediments in Austria using cost-effective microbiotests.
    Latif M; Licek E
    Environ Toxicol; 2004 Aug; 19(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 15269900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies for decolorization and detoxification of pulp and paper mill effluent.
    Garg SK; Tripathi M
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011; 212():113-36. PubMed ID: 21432056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of acute and early life stage toxicity of fat-plant effluent using zebrafish (Danio rerio).
    Sişman T; Incekara U; Yildiz YS
    Environ Toxicol; 2008 Aug; 23(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 18246548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: how will it affect risk assessment?
    Rhomberg LR
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):361-75. PubMed ID: 20574908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.