592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21919311)
1. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of connector height and retainer occlusal thickness on the fracture resistance of posterior 4-unit monolithic 5Y-TZP fixed partial dentures after thermomechanical aging.
ElShamoty YK; Sadeqi HA; Baig MR
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):933.e1-933.e7. PubMed ID: 38429151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Titanium-zirconium Implants in Posterior Sites: One-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Alsabeeha NHM; Amir-Rad F; Ma S; Shah M; Hannawi H; Tawse-Smith A; Duncan WJ; Baqain ZH; Atieh MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-23. PubMed ID: 38728047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture characteristics and translucency of multilayer monolithic zirconia crowns of various thicknesses.
Kang CM; Hsu WC; Chen MS; Wu HY; Mine Y; Peng TY
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105023. PubMed ID: 38670331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sol-gel dip coating of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia dental ceramic by aluminosilicate nanocomposite as a novel technique to improve the bonding of veneering porcelain.
Madani A; Nakhaei M; Karami P; Rajabzadeh G; Salehi S; Bagheri H
Int J Nanomedicine; 2016; 11():3215-23. PubMed ID: 27478376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Monolithic Zirconia, Veneered Zirconia, and Metal-Ceramic Full-Coverage Restorations: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
Almohammed SN; Dourado AM; Al Quran FA
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 38381987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.
Joda T; Zarone F; Ferrari M
BMC Oral Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28927393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Graded zirconia glass for resistance to veneer fracture.
Zhang Y; Kim JW
J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1057-62. PubMed ID: 20651092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical outcome of three-unit fixed-fixed posterior zirconia ceramic inlay-retained FDPs with a modified design.
Chaar MS; Passia N; Becker M; Kern M
J Dent; 2024 Jan; 140():104781. PubMed ID: 37981045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of screw channel angulation on reverse torque value and fracture resistance in monolithic zirconia restorations after thermomechanical cycling: an in-vitro study.
Khaledi AA; Shalileh S; Hejazi M; Giti R
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):389. PubMed ID: 38532413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dental biomechanics of root-analog implants in different bone types.
Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Blom EJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):905-915. PubMed ID: 36428106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of ceramic crown design (translucent monolithic zirconia vs. bilayered) of implant-supported single crowns after mechanical cycling.
de Oliveira Limirio JPJ; Gomes JML; Santiago-Junior JF; Nagay BE; Pesqueira AA; Assunção WG; Alves-Rezende MCR; Pellizzer EP
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38665052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An In Vitro Investigation of the Role of Implant Abutment Materials on the Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Implant-Supported Restorations.
Teja Obulareddy V; Dixit A; Takhellambam V; Verma RK; Deepyanti ; Kumar S; Kumar A
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54624. PubMed ID: 38529462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with zirconia crowns, lithium disilicate or resin based ceramic endocrowns.
Ali AAEM; Abo-ELsoud AAE; Helmy YS
BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):583. PubMed ID: 38764030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screw-retrievable cement-retained implant restorations: A scoping review of fracture strength and clinical performance.
Kamar Affendi NH; Ahmad R; Tong Wah L; Abdul Hamid NF; Abdul Hakim AY
Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(2):257-268. PubMed ID: 38686968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Fracture Resistance of Additively Manufactured Monolithic Zirconia vs. Bi-Layered Alumina Toughened Zirconia Crowns When Cemented to Zirconia Abutments. Evaluating the Potential of 3D Printing of Ceramic Crowns: An In Vitro Study.
Zandinejad A; Revilla-León M; Methani MM; Nasiry Khanlar L; Morton D
Dent J (Basel); 2021 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 34677177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Load-bearing capacity of 3D-printed incisor partial-coverage crowns made from zirconia and composite.
Handermann R; Zehender N; Rues S; Kobayashi H; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38684407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of New Design of Access Hole on Porcelain Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Crowns.
Derafshi R; Farzin M; Taghva M; Heidary H; Atashkar B
J Dent (Shiraz); 2015 Mar; 16(1 Suppl):61-7. PubMed ID: 26106637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical fit and chairside adjustment time for implant-supported crowns fabricated by fully digital and partially digital techniques.
Haghi HR; Ghanbarzadeh J; Kiamanesh E
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):865-870. PubMed ID: 35525625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: Trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects.
Alghauli M; Alqutaibi AY; Wille S; Kern M
J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104925. PubMed ID: 38471580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
