112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2192092)
1. The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct.
JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2192092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct. Results of the FDA program.
Shapiro MF; Charrow RP
JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2505-11. PubMed ID: 2704109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data audit by a regulatory agency: its effect and implication for others.
Shapiro MF
Account Res; 1992; 2(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 11653981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct: undue process.
Efron R
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):223-38. PubMed ID: 11652297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A call for the development of "Good Research Practices" (GRP) guidelines.
Glick JL; Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1993; 2(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editors and auditors.
Rennie D
JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
Friedman PJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical trials integrity: a CRO perspective.
Beach JE
Account Res; 2001; 8(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 12481762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ensuring scientific integrity in research: aspects of fairness and justice.
Green HP
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11652295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioethics and applied biomaterials.
Saha S; Saha P
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Aug; 21(Suppl. A2):181-90. PubMed ID: 11649924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitching doctors.
Wilkes MS; Shuchman M
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Nov; ():88, 90, 126, 128-129. PubMed ID: 11650264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Misconduct in science.
Budetti PP
Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):99. PubMed ID: 2323502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The letter or the spirit. Consent for research in CPR.
Olson CM
JAMA; 1994 May; 271(18):1445-7. PubMed ID: 8176805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rights to due process in instances of possible scientific misconduct.
Hallum JV; Hadley SW
Endocrinology; 1991 Feb; 128(2):643-4. PubMed ID: 1989853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board.
Anderson C
Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
