These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21921568)

  • 1. Intra- and interobserver variability of intrapartum cardiotocography: a multicenter study comparing the FIGO classification with computer analysis software.
    Schiermeier S; Westhof G; Leven A; Hatzmann H; Reinhard J
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 21921568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation.
    Palomäki O; Luukkaala T; Luoto R; Tuimala R
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16856819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
    Rhöse S; Heinis AM; Vandenbussche F; van Drongelen J; van Dillen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity and specificity of intrapartum computerised FIGO criteria for cardiotocography and fetal scalp pH during labour: multicentre, observational study.
    Schiermeier S; Pildner von Steinburg S; Thieme A; Reinhard J; Daumer M; Scholz M; Hatzmann W; Schneider KT
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1557-63. PubMed ID: 18752587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of Doppler cardiotocogram computer analysis system 70 minutes before delivery].
    Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Reinhard J
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):189-93. PubMed ID: 18956277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum cardiotocography: an exploratory analysis of interpretational variation.
    Amadori R; Vaianella E; Tosi M; Baronchelli P; Surico D; Remorgida V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 42(7):2753-2757. PubMed ID: 35950331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Structure and function of the cardiotocographic score (CTG-score) calculated by the "quantitative cardiotocography" computer method. Determining the significance of its components for the accuracy of the estimates for the ph of the fetus].
    Ignatov P; Atanasov B
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2011; 50(3):13-20. PubMed ID: 21916310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean.
    Caning MM; Thisted DLA; Amer-Wählin I; Laier GH; Krebs L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Can the outcome pH value be predicted?
    Kundu S; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; von Ehr J; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 28879450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
    Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
    Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
    BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms.
    Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Ayres-de-Campos D; van Geijn HP; Pereira-Leite L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Apr; 57(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
    Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quantitative CTG appraisal sub partu with a new CTG score: diagnostic significance of the parameters of the acid-base balance in umbilical blood?].
    Roemer VM
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2003; 207(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 14528413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver agreements in assessing 549 labor admission tests after a standardized training program.
    Blix E; Oian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1087-92. PubMed ID: 16232177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
    Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.