These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21922954)

  • 1. Establishing a range of motion boundary for total hip arthroplasty.
    Turley GA; Ahmed SM; Williams MA; Griffin DR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Aug; 225(8):769-82. PubMed ID: 21922954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint.
    Bartz RL; Nobel PC; Kadakia NR; Tullos HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1300-7. PubMed ID: 11005521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impingement-dislocation risk of total hip replacement: effects of cup orientation and patient maneuvers.
    Ghaffari M; Nickmanesh R; Tamannaee N; Farahmand F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6801-4. PubMed ID: 23367491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Haimerl M; Dohmen L; Gneiting S; Lechler P; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Weber M; Sussmann P; Sendtner E; Grifka J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 22559740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement-effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion.
    Ng FY; Zhang JT; Chiu KY; Yan CH
    Int Orthop; 2011 Mar; 35(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 20177891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
    Plummer DR; Haughom BD; Della Valle CJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 45(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24267202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty.
    Koyanagi J; Sakai T; Yamazaki T; Watanabe T; Akiyama K; Sugano N; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 21131111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metal transfer on a ceramic head with a single rim contact.
    Tomek IM; Currier JH; Mayor MB; Van Citters DW
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):324.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21440409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using artificial neural networks to predict impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Alastruey-López D; Ezquerra L; Seral B; Pérez MA
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Aug; 23(10):649-657. PubMed ID: 32364804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
    Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?
    Cinotti G; Lucioli N; Malagoli A; Calderoli C; Cassese F
    Int Orthop; 2011 Mar; 35(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 20157813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH
    Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-33. PubMed ID: 17661036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental analysis of neutral, asymmetric and constraint liners for total hip replacement: investigation of range of motion and protection against joint instability].
    Bader R; Steinhauser E; Scholz R; Simnacher M; Mittelmeier W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(5):577-85. PubMed ID: 15472768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between dislocation, impingement, and articular geometry in retrieved acetabular polyethylene cups.
    Tanino H; Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 17471491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.