These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2192314)

  • 1. The nonstress test.
    Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 17(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 2192314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes.
    Paine LL; Benedict MI; Strobino DM; Gegor CL; Larson EL
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1549525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
    Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score].
    Beco J; Lambotte R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of antenatal testing: estriol levels versus nonstress testing.
    Lauersen NH; Kurkulos M; Graves ZR; Lewin K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6856212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evaluation of antepartum fetal well-being using the nonstress test.
    Paul RH
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 6749370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance.
    Eden RD; Seifert LS; Kodack LD; Trofatter KF; Killam AP; Gall SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):365-9. PubMed ID: 3279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percent acceleration time: a new method of fetal assessment.
    Devoe LD; Castillo R; Saad S; McKenzie J; Searle N; Davis H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 3945428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing.
    Boehm FH; Salyer S; Shah DM; Vaughn WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):566-8. PubMed ID: 3960430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal movement monitoring: clinical application.
    Baskett TF; Liston RM
    Clin Perinatol; 1989 Sep; 16(3):613-25. PubMed ID: 2673611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.