These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2192314)

  • 21. A new computerized analysis to precisely evaluate heart rate variability during the nonstress test.
    Kobayashi H; Yoshida A; Kobayashi M; Hamada T; Noguchi Y; Yamada T
    Am J Perinatol; 2003 Feb; 20(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 12660912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonstress and contraction stress fetal heart rate monitoring. A randomized trial to determine which is the faster primary test.
    Newnham JP; Burns SE; Szczygielski C; Roberman B
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 3367336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The nonreactive nonstress test: predictive value for neonatal anemia in the isoimmunized pregnancy.
    Ouzounian JG; Alsulyman OM; Monteiro HA; Songster GS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):364-7. PubMed ID: 8752240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The nonstress test. Criteria for the duration of fetal heart rate acceleration.
    Willis DC; Blanco JD; Hamblen KA; Stovall DW
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Sep; 35(9):901-3. PubMed ID: 2231567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Clinical value of remote fetal monitoring network in high-risk pregnancy].
    Qi H; Sun J; Liu J; He X; Zhang J; Qin Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):455-8. PubMed ID: 12411022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The duration of the outpatient nonstress test (NST) and the diagnosis of fetal reactivity with noncomputerized cardiotocography, A critical review of 1160 tracings].
    Cito G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997; 49(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9162883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Maternal response to daily fetal movement counting in primary care settings.
    Eggertsen SC; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Oct; 4(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 3651191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Antepartum fetal heart testing: a clinical appraisal.
    Goldkrand JW; Benjamin DS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 63(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 6691017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The contraction stress test.
    Pircon RA; Freeman RK
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 17(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 2192315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment.
    Norman LA; Karp LE
    Am Fam Physician; 1986 Oct; 34(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 3532741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of explicit criteria on nonstress test evaluation by obstetric nurses.
    Skurnick JH; Chez RA; Chez BF
    Am J Perinatol; 1991 Mar; 8(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 2006941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fetal monitoring using fetal movement count perceived by patient].
    Takeshita T
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Oct; 35(10):1741-8. PubMed ID: 6631151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fetal well-being: nonimaging assessment and the biophysical profile.
    Jackson GM; Forouzan I; Cohen AW
    Semin Roentgenol; 1991 Jan; 26(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 2006429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The nonstress test. Reassessment of the "gold standard".
    Ware DJ; Devoe LD
    Clin Perinatol; 1994 Dec; 21(4):779-96. PubMed ID: 7882643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Foetos: an expert system for fetal assessment.
    Alonso-Betanzos A; Moret-Bonillo V; Hernández-Sande C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Feb; 38(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 2066130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patients' acceptance of monitoring fetal movement. A randomized comparison of charting techniques.
    Smith CV; Davis SA; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Feb; 37(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 1538359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.