294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21923659)
1. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s14-7. PubMed ID: 19916262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.
Pai GS; Bhat PS; Mallya H; Gold M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 21692640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
Barolet D
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of long-pulse alexandrite and long-pulse Nd:YAG laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal.
Khoury JG; Saluja R; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):665-70; discussion 670-1. PubMed ID: 18261098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of a 0.65 millisecond pulsed portable ND:YAG laser for hair removal.
Khatri KA; Lee RA; Goldberg LJ; Khatri B; Garcia V
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19199118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial.
Ismail SA
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Feb; 166(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 21999492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laser hair removal: comparison of long-pulsed Nd:YAG, long-pulsed alexandrite, and long-pulsed diode lasers.
Bouzari N; Tabatabai H; Abbasi Z; Firooz A; Dowlati Y
Dermatol Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4 Pt 1):498-502. PubMed ID: 15056137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An efficacy comparison of hair removal utilizing a diode laser and an Nd:YAG laser system in Chinese women.
Li R; Zhou Z; Gold MH
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2010 Oct; 12(5):213-7. PubMed ID: 20825259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.
Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up.
Davoudi SM; Behnia F; Gorouhi F; Keshavarz S; Nassiri Kashani M; Rashighi Firoozabadi M; Firooz A
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1323-7. PubMed ID: 18936396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of focal axillary hyperhidrosis using a long-pulsed Nd:YAG 1064 nm laser at hair reduction settings.
Letada PR; Landers JT; Uebelhoer NS; Shumaker PR
J Drugs Dermatol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 22206078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808 nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser.
Grunewald S; Bodendorf MO; Zygouris A; Simon JC; Paasch U
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24127195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study on a single treatment response to long pulse Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulse light therapy for hair removal on skin type IV to VI--is longer wavelengths lasers preferred over shorter wavelengths lights for assisted hair removal.
Goh CL
J Dermatolog Treat; 2003 Dec; 14(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 14660273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin: a clinical and histological evaluation.
Alster TS; Bryan H; Williams CM
Arch Dermatol; 2001 Jul; 137(7):885-9. PubMed ID: 11453807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixed, low radiant exposure vs. incremental radiant exposure approach for diode laser hair reduction: a randomized, split axilla, comparative single-blinded trial.
Pavlović MD; Adamič M; Nenadić D
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2377-81. PubMed ID: 26299540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multipass low fluence, high-frequency 755-nm alexandrite laser versus high fluence, low-frequency 1064-nm long-pulsed Nd: YAG laser in axillary hair reduction of dark skin phototypes: an intra-individual randomized comparative study.
Moftah N; Tymour M; Ibrahim SMA
J Dermatolog Treat; 2022 Jun; 33(4):2079-2084. PubMed ID: 33844620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
