These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21923700)

  • 1. Massively parallel rRNA gene sequencing exacerbates the potential for biased community diversity comparisons due to variable library sizes.
    Gihring TM; Green SJ; Schadt CW
    Environ Microbiol; 2012 Feb; 14(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 21923700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Species richness in soil bacterial communities: a proposed approach to overcome sample size bias.
    Youssef NH; Elshahed MS
    J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Sep; 75(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18585806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Massively parallel tag sequencing reveals the complexity of anaerobic marine protistan communities.
    Stoeck T; Behnke A; Christen R; Amaral-Zettler L; Rodriguez-Mora MJ; Chistoserdov A; Orsi W; Edgcomb VP
    BMC Biol; 2009 Nov; 7():72. PubMed ID: 19886985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments: what 16S rDNA libraries can tell us.
    Kemp PF; Aller JY
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Feb; 47(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 19712332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the suitability of short reads of 16S rRNA for phylogeny-based analyses in environmental surveys.
    Jeraldo P; Chia N; Goldenfeld N
    Environ Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 13(11):3000-9. PubMed ID: 21910812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water.
    Stoeck T; Bass D; Nebel M; Christen R; Jones MD; Breiner HW; Richards TA
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Mar; 19 Suppl 1():21-31. PubMed ID: 20331767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A diverse bacterial community in an anoxic quinoline-degrading bioreactor determined by using pyrosequencing and clone library analysis.
    Zhang X; Yue S; Zhong H; Hua W; Chen R; Cao Y; Zhao L
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Jul; 91(2):425-34. PubMed ID: 21538111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It's all relative: ranking the diversity of aquatic bacterial communities.
    Shaw AK; Halpern AL; Beeson K; Tran B; Venter JC; Martiny JB
    Environ Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 10(9):2200-10. PubMed ID: 18637951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
    Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of condensed tannins on bovine rumen protist diversity based on 18S rRNA gene sequences.
    Tan HY; Sieo CC; Abdullah N; Liang JB; Huang XD; Ho YW
    J Eukaryot Microbiol; 2013; 60(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 23205499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes.
    Amaral-Zettler LA; McCliment EA; Ducklow HW; Huse SM
    PLoS One; 2009 Jul; 4(7):e6372. PubMed ID: 19633714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacterial diversity of Taxus rhizosphere: culture-independent and culture-dependent approaches.
    Hao da C; Ge GB; Yang L
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2008 Jul; 284(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 18576948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metagenomics: read length matters.
    Wommack KE; Bhavsar J; Ravel J
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 74(5):1453-63. PubMed ID: 18192407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias in assessments of marine microbial biodiversity in fosmid libraries as evaluated by pyrosequencing.
    Temperton B; Field D; Oliver A; Tiwari B; Mühling M; Joint I; Gilbert JA
    ISME J; 2009 Jul; 3(7):792-6. PubMed ID: 19340085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which sequencing depth is sufficient to describe patterns in bacterial α- and β-diversity?
    Lundin D; Severin I; Logue JB; Ostman O; Andersson AF; Lindström ES
    Environ Microbiol Rep; 2012 Jun; 4(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 23760801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size.
    Hortal J; Borges PA; Gaspar C
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):274-87. PubMed ID: 16903065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rethinking microbial diversity analysis in the high throughput sequencing era.
    Lemos LN; Fulthorpe RR; Triplett EW; Roesch LF
    J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Jul; 86(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21457733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using two next-generation sequencing technologies for phylogenetic analysis of the rumen bacterial community in steers.
    Myer PR; Kim M; Freetly HC; Smith TPL
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():132-140. PubMed ID: 27282101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of bacteria associated with different mosses by 16S rRNA and 16S rDNA sequencing.
    Tian Y; Li YH
    J Basic Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 57(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 27515736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A snapshot on prokaryotic diversity of the Solimões River basin (Amazon, Brazil).
    Toyama D; Santos-Júnior CD; Kishi LT; Oliveira TCS; Garcia JW; Sarmento H; Miranda FP; Henrique-Silva F
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 May; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28525656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.