BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21924445)

  • 1. [Reviewing an article for Radiología: who and how].
    García Santos JM
    Radiologia; 2011; 53(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 21924445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The editorial process for Radiología].
    Corral de la Calle MA
    Radiologia; 2011; 53(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 21696794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of the scientific quality of spanish radiologists that publish in international radiology journals and in spanish radiology journals].
    Martí-Bonmatí L; Catalá-Gregori AI; Miguel-Dasit A
    Radiologia; 2011; 53(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 21300384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.
    Garfield JM; Kaye AD; Kolinsky DC; Urman RD
    J Med Pract Manage; 2015; 30(6 Spec No):13-7. PubMed ID: 26062311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The peer review process: a primer for
    Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-citation: comparison between Radiología, European Radiology and Radiology for 1997-1998.
    Miguel A; Martí-Bonmatí L
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jan; 12(1):248-52. PubMed ID: 11868105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [What do reviewers look for in 'original articles' submitted for publication in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde?].
    Tjon MJ; Sang F; Overbeke AJ; Lockefeer JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1996 Nov; 140(47):2349-52. PubMed ID: 8984399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypothetical influence of non-indexed Spanish journals on the impact factor of radiological journals.
    Miguel-Dasit A; Aleixandre R; Valderrama JC; Martí-Bonmatí L; Sanfeliu P
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 15899331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
    Igi R
    J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Celedonio Calatayud-Costa and the birth of the specialty, the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology, and the journal: the beginning of a century of Spanish radiology].
    Puyalto de Pablo P; Sánchez Fernández JJ; García Santos JM
    Radiologia; 2012; 54(6):539-48. PubMed ID: 23174477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Why and how to write and publish a paper in a radiology journal].
    Soyer P; Taourel P; Trillaud H; Vicaut E; Laurent F; Dion E
    J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 92(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 21501756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research.
    Desselle SP; Chen AM; Amin M; Aslani P; Dawoud D; Miller MJ; Norgaard LS
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2020 Feb; 16(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 31101458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
    Faggion CM
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rejection Under Peer Review.
    Pollock NW
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Mar; 30(1):1. PubMed ID: 30712825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.
    Savulescu J; Viens AM
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):591-7. PubMed ID: 16199602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.