336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21924445)
21. Poor title--poor manuscript?
Gjersvik P; Gulbrandsen P; Aasheim ET; Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Dec; 133(23-24):2475-7. PubMed ID: 24326496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Results of a longitudinal study of rigorous manuscript submission guidelines designed to improve the quality of clinical research reporting in a peer-reviewed surgical journal.
Wynne KE; Simpson BJ; Berman L; Rangel SJ; Grosfeld JL; Moss RL
J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 21238654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
Senturia SD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Kliewer MA; Freed KS; DeLong DM; Pickhardt PJ; Provenzale JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1731-5. PubMed ID: 15908521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Peer reviews: the dreaded rejection.
Venkatesh S; Maymone MB; Vashi NA
Dermatol Online J; 2018 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 29634877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
McNutt RA; Evans AT; Fletcher RH; Fletcher SW
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 2304216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review?
Yankauer A
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1338-40. PubMed ID: 2304210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Editor and authors' psychology and the chance of teaching.
Grammaticos PC
Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 17160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tutorial for writing systematic reviews for the Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT).
Mancini MC; Cardoso JR; Sampaio RF; Costa LC; Cabral CM; Costa LO
Braz J Phys Ther; 2014; 18(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 25590440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [How to write an original article for a biomedical journal].
García Santos JM
Radiologia; 2011; 53(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 21621805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Editing of articles accepted for publication by the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde].
Walvoort HC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Jan; 141(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 9162848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
Muir-Cochrane E
Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
Biddle C
AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde.
Pierie JP; Walvoort HC; Overbeke AJ
Lancet; 1996 Nov; 348(9040):1480-3. PubMed ID: 8942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R
Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [How to write a scientific paper].
Parati G; Valentini M
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2005 Apr; 6(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 15902941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What do reviewers look for in an original research article?
Shankar PR
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2012; 52(186):95-101. PubMed ID: 23478739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
