These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21924445)

  • 41. Processing a manuscript submitted to a medical journal.
    Cavaliere F; Antonelli M
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2009 Oct; 75(10):574-6. PubMed ID: 19088700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Richardson ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [How do I write a scientific article--advice to a young researcher].
    Auvinen A
    Duodecim; 2015; 131(16):1460-6. PubMed ID: 26485939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?
    Allen TW
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Writing for publication: a performance enhancement guide for the human services professional.
    Luiselli JK
    Behav Modif; 2010 Sep; 34(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 20935244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How to evaluate and acknowledge a scientific journal peer reviewer: a proposed index to measure the performance of reviewers.
    Messias AMV; Lira RPC; Furtado JMF; Paula JS; Rocha EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2017; 80(6):V. PubMed ID: 29267566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bibliometric analysis of the Spanish MR radiological production (2001-2007).
    Miguel-Dasit A; Martí-Bonmatí L; Sanfeliu P
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 18424037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.
    Kumar PD
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The
    Wang YF; Handelsman D; Cooper TG
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(5):511. PubMed ID: 28782736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Writing for publication in medical education in high impact journals.
    Azer SA; Dupras DM; Azer S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014 Oct; 18(19):2966-81. PubMed ID: 25339494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.
    Green SM; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):149-152.e4. PubMed ID: 20947204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Acknowledging the peer reviewers of Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences October 2014-September 2015.
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2015 Dec; 62(4):297. PubMed ID: 27512579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reviewing papers for Australian Journal of Rural Health-The benefits and the mechanics.
    Campbell N; Spelten E; Burmeister OK
    Aust J Rural Health; 2020 Aug; 28(4):324-326. PubMed ID: 32857467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Spanish production of research articles on diagnostic imaging in cardiology and radiology (1994-1998)].
    Miguel-Dasit A; Martí-Bonmatí L; Aleixandre R; Sanfeliu P; Valderrama JC
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):806-14. PubMed ID: 15373986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A guide to reviewing manuscripts.
    Alexander GR
    Matern Child Health J; 2005 Mar; 9(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 15880980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How blind is blind review?
    Yankauer A
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Jul; 81(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 2053657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers.
    Callaham M; McCulloch C
    Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21074894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.