BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21924634)

  • 1. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
    Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
    Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
    Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic changes during posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass: comparison between deep pericardial sutures and vacuum-assisted apical suction device.
    Chang WI; Kim KB; Kim JH; Ham BM; Kim YL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Dec; 78(6):2057-62. PubMed ID: 15561035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
    Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
    Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
    Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of cerebral oximetry in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an observational study.
    Moritz S; Rochon J; Völkel S; Hilker M; Hobbhahn J; Graf BM; Arlt M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):542-9. PubMed ID: 20299994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery.
    Qiao H; Zhang J; Liang WM
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2010 Oct; 22(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 20622685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
    Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
    Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
    Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.
    Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
    Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.