These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery. Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation. Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemodynamic changes during posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass: comparison between deep pericardial sutures and vacuum-assisted apical suction device. Chang WI; Kim KB; Kim JH; Ham BM; Kim YL Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Dec; 78(6):2057-62. PubMed ID: 15561035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY; Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter. Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determinants of cerebral oximetry in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an observational study. Moritz S; Rochon J; Völkel S; Hilker M; Hobbhahn J; Graf BM; Arlt M Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):542-9. PubMed ID: 20299994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery. Qiao H; Zhang J; Liang WM J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2010 Oct; 22(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 20622685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs. Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery. Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery. Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Osman D; Ridel C; Ray P; Monnet X; Anguel N; Richard C; Teboul JL Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17080001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]