These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21924652)

  • 1. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Giannakopoulos NN
    Vet J; 2012 May; 192(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21924652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.
    Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 23557434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health.
    Wasiak J; Shen AY; Tan HB; Mahar R; Kan G; Khoo WR; Faggion CM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):399-431. PubMed ID: 26589200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.
    Ross A; Rankin J; Beaman J; Murray K; Sinnett P; Riddle R; Haskins J; Vassar M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181927. PubMed ID: 28771633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Animal research as a basis for clinical trials.
    Faggion CM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2015 Apr; 123(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 25684017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental Students' Use of AMSTAR to Critically Appraise Systematic Reviews.
    Teich ST; Heima M; Lang L
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 26329027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS).
    Sequeira-Byron P; Fedorowicz Z; Jagannath VA; Sharif MO
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 21986647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry, Part 1: Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    El-Rabbany M; Li S; Bui S; Muir JM; Bhandari M; Azarpazhooh A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 17(4):389-398. PubMed ID: 29197440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on short dental implants.
    Elangovan S; Mawardi HH; Karimbux NY
    J Periodontol; 2013 Jun; 84(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 22873652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.
    Elangovan S; Avila-Ortiz G; Johnson GK; Karimbux N; Allareddy V
    J Periodontol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 22509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.