118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21925575)
1. Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?
Shapiro MS; Schuck-Paim C; Kacelnik A
Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 21925575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive mechanisms of risky choice: is there an evaluation cost?
Aw J; Monteiro T; Vasconcelos M; Kacelnik A
Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 22001371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Context-dependent preferences in starlings: linking ecology, foraging and choice.
Vasconcelos M; Monteiro T; Kacelnik A
PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64934. PubMed ID: 23705019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.
Anselme P
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2024-2036. PubMed ID: 29435964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for a magnitude effect in temporal discounting with pigeons.
Grace RC; Sargisson RJ; White KG
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 22229590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential and simultaneous choices: testing the diet selection and sequential choice models.
Freidin E; Aw J; Kacelnik A
Behav Processes; 2009 Mar; 80(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 20522312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous and sequential choice as a function of reward delay and magnitude: normative, descriptive and process-based models tested in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris).
Shapiro MS; Siller S; Kacelnik A
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 18248116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring preferences for variable delays over fixed delays to high-value food rewards as a model of food-seeking behaviours in humans.
Stokes LG; Davies A; Lattimore P; Winstanley C; Rogers RD
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 374(1766):20180141. PubMed ID: 30966913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans.
Addessi E; Bellagamba F; Delfino A; De Petrillo F; Focaroli V; Macchitella L; Maggiorelli V; Pace B; Pecora G; Rossi S; Sbaffi A; Tasselli MI; Paglieri F
Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):428-41. PubMed ID: 24387915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of risk on intertemporal choice and preference reversal.
Xu P; Cheng J; Sang H
J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Mar; 117(2):151-166. PubMed ID: 35025105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Starlings' preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food.
Bateson M; Kacelnik A
Anim Behav; 1997 Jun; 53(6):1129-42. PubMed ID: 9236010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: variability in amount and delay.
Bateson M; Kacelnik A
J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 May; 63(3):313-29. PubMed ID: 7751835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delay aversion but preference for large and rare rewards in two choice tasks: implications for the measurement of self-control parameters.
Adriani W; Laviola G
BMC Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 7():52. PubMed ID: 16796752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observing response acquisition: preference for unpredictable appetitive rewards obtained under conditions predicted by DMOD.
Daly HB
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):294-316. PubMed ID: 4009123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
Beeby E; White KG
J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How unpredictable access to food increases the body fat of small passerines: A mechanistic approach.
Anselme P; Otto T; Güntürkün O
Behav Processes; 2017 Nov; 144():33-45. PubMed ID: 28870644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuro-economics in chicks: foraging choices based on amount, delay and cost.
Matsushima T; Kawamori A; Bem-Sojka T
Brain Res Bull; 2008 Jun; 76(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 18498937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Isolating behavioral mechanisms of intertemporal choice: nicotine effects on delay discounting and amount sensitivity.
Locey ML; Dallery J
J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 19794835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scalar utility theory and proportional processing: What does it actually imply?
Rosenström T; Wiesner K; Houston AI
J Theor Biol; 2016 Sep; 404():222-235. PubMed ID: 27288541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of d-amphetamine on risk choice in rats depend on the manner in which the expected reward value is varied.
Yang JH; Cheng CP; Liao RM
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2018 Aug; 171():20-29. PubMed ID: 29782943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
