BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21925575)

  • 21. The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):431-445. PubMed ID: 31414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stochastic satisficing account of confidence in uncertain value-based decisions.
    Hertz U; Bahrami B; Keramati M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195399. PubMed ID: 29621325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is it patience or motivation? On motivational confounds in intertemporal choice tasks.
    Paglieri F; Addessi E; Sbaffi A; Tasselli MI; Delfino A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):196-217. PubMed ID: 25545635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward.
    Monteiro T; Vasconcelos M; Kacelnik A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Apr; 280(1756):20122386. PubMed ID: 23390098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings.
    Marsh B; Kacelnik A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Mar; 99(5):3352-5. PubMed ID: 11867709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ADHD and delay aversion: the influence of non-temporal stimulation on choice for delayed rewards.
    Antrop I; Stock P; Verté S; Wiersema JR; Baeyens D; Roeyers H
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1152-8. PubMed ID: 17076754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Parameters of variable reward distributions that affect risk sensitivity of honey bees.
    Drezner-Levy T; Shafir S
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Jan; 210(Pt 2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human choices between variable and fixed rewards in hypothetical variable-delay and double-reward discounting procedures.
    McKerchar TL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jul; 106(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 27353633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risky choice and Weber's Law.
    Kacelnik A; Brito e Abreu F
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 9778440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice.
    Ojeda A; Murphy RA; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jul; 152():73-80. PubMed ID: 29608942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.
    Brilot BO; Asher L; Bateson M
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Sep; 13(5):721-31. PubMed ID: 20464439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Balancing risk and reward: a rat model of risky decision making.
    Simon NW; Gilbert RJ; Mayse JD; Bizon JL; Setlow B
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2009 Sep; 34(10):2208-17. PubMed ID: 19440192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of the nucleus accumbens core in impulsive choice, timing, and reward processing.
    Galtress T; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 124(1):26-43. PubMed ID: 20141278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An efficient operant choice procedure for assessing delay discounting in humans: initial validation in cocaine-dependent and control individuals.
    Johnson MW
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Jun; 20(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 22329554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risky choice in pigeons: preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system.
    Lagorio CH; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 23008519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.
    Steele CC; Peterson JR; Marshall AT; Stuebing SL; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():28-38. PubMed ID: 29146281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When is it worth waiting for? Food quantity, but not food quality, affects delay tolerance in tufted capuchin monkeys.
    De Petrillo F; Gori E; Micucci A; Ponsi G; Paglieri F; Addessi E
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Sep; 18(5):1019-29. PubMed ID: 25894673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of response rate on reward value in a self-control task.
    Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 25533528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Behavioral modeling of human choices reveals dissociable effects of physical effort and temporal delay on reward devaluation.
    Klein-Flügge MC; Kennerley SW; Saraiva AC; Penny WD; Bestmann S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1004116. PubMed ID: 25816114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.