These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21925779)

  • 1. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio.
    Malviya A; Lingard EA; Malik A; Bowman R; Holland JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 19285379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases.
    Lavigne M; Rama KR; Roy A; Vendittoli PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18534499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Wirth CJ; Gossé F
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Sep; 18(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 16953347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Harvey N; Zaragoza E; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17259408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach].
    Gravius S; Mumme T; Weber O; Berdel P; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2009 Dec; 21(6):586-601. PubMed ID: 20087719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Yoo MC; Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():99-106. PubMed ID: 21543698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Restoration of femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty].
    Shi ZC; Li ZR
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 42(16):997-1000. PubMed ID: 15363238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Resection of head and neck of the femoral bone according to Girdlestone].
    Stoklas J; Rozkydal Z
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 15307299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femoral anteversion, femoral offset, and abductor lever arm after total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system.
    Sakai T; Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Haraguchi K; Yoshikawa H
    J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 11819134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach.
    Oinuma K; Eingartner C; Saito Y; Shiratsuchi H
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Aug; 19(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 17728988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of femoral offset change on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty].
    Xu B; Yang D; Aili R; Cao L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 27(7):843-6. PubMed ID: 24063174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.