These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study. Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of coronary artery disease by combined assessment of wall motion, myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve: a multiparametric contrast stress-echocardiography study. Gaibazzi N; Rigo F; Reverberi C J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Dec; 23(12):1242-50. PubMed ID: 20951000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire. Kurita T; Sakuma H; Onishi K; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Yamanaka T; Tanigawa T; Kitamura T; Takeda K; Ito M Eur Heart J; 2009 Feb; 30(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 19098020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid imaging using quantitative H215O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. Danad I; Raijmakers PG; Appelman YE; Harms HJ; de Haan S; van den Oever ML; Heymans MW; Tulevski II; van Kuijk C; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Lubberink M; van Rossum AC; Knaapen P J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 54(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23232274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]