BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21927522)

  • 1. On the development of a frequency-lowering system that enhances place-of-articulation perception.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A
    Speech Commun; 2012 Jan; 54(1):147-160. PubMed ID: 21927522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a vocoder-based frequency-lowering method and spectral enhancement to improve place-of-articulation perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 23165224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intelligibility of frequency-lowered speech produced by a channel vocoder.
    Posen MP; Reed CM; Braida LD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 8263827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination of speech processed by low-pass filtering and pitch-invariant frequency lowering.
    Reed CM; Hicks BL; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Aug; 74(2):409-19. PubMed ID: 6619418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
    Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants.
    Hedrick MS; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1445-57. PubMed ID: 9430763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Brus SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2999-3006. PubMed ID: 11425142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relational spectral features for place of articulation in nasal consonants.
    Seitz PF; McCormick MM; Watson IM; Bladon RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):351-8. PubMed ID: 2299045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants.
    Behrens S; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 3183204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.
    Donaldson GS; Dawson PK; Borden LZ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 21084987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.