These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21927782)

  • 1. Evolutionary trends in peer review.
    Morey A; Garner A; Faruque F; Yang G
    J Allied Health; 2011; 40(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 21927782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Where to now for health-related journal peer review?
    Lipworth W; Kerridge I
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):724-7. PubMed ID: 21774269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: Does it matter?
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2011; 40(2):55. PubMed ID: 21695363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality science and quality assurance: observations of an environmental scientist.
    Hughes TJ
    Qual Assur; 1999; 7(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11191123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants.
    Grainger DW
    Biomaterials; 2007 Dec; 28(34):5199-203. PubMed ID: 17643484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement.
    Stang A; Poole C; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 18313552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
    Eldredge J
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Future of open access could be online and peer-reviewed.
    Sandal M
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):158. PubMed ID: 18615058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strengths and weaknesses of allied health special project grant applications.
    Brand MK; Clark N; Paavola FG; Pitts R
    J Allied Health; 1992; 21(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 1399813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewers peering from under a pile of 'omics' data.
    Nicholson JK
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):992. PubMed ID: 16625173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in relation to allowing passengers to fly the airplane.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2011; 40(3):113. PubMed ID: 21927775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Flanagin A
    Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology.
    Wong VS
    J Child Neurol; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 20606060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Little evidence to support the use of editorial peer review to ensure quality of published research.
    Richards D
    Evid Based Dent; 2007; 8(3):88-9. PubMed ID: 17891131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].
    Shashok K
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1946-50. PubMed ID: 9528039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.