These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21927782)

  • 21. [Double-blind peer review].
    Fenyvesi T
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 11875838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?
    Frishauf P
    MedGenMed; 2006 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 16915135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 'Free' peer-review publishing.
    Thornton J
    BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):515-6. PubMed ID: 15198775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Readers' and author's responses to "are traditional peer-reviewed medical articles obsolete?".
    Goodman MJ
    MedGenMed; 2006 Mar; 8(1):70; author reply 70. PubMed ID: 16915200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The publication rate of abstracts from the 4th Park City Pediatric Rheumatology meeting in peer-reviewed journals: what factors influenced publication?
    Hashkes P; Uziel Y;
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Mar; 30(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 12610823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers.
    Navalta JW; Lyons TS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Dec; 34(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 21098383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trends and future challenges in medical editing.
    Akhtar J
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2011 Jan; 21(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 21276375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals.
    Thomas SP
    J Prof Nurs; 2011; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 21596357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Role of the manuscript reviewer.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review.
    Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts.
    Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome M
    West J Nurs Res; 2011 Jun; 33(4):506-21. PubMed ID: 21078915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Improvement and decision-making process of an article].
    Matías-Guiu J; García Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2009; 24(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 19798600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of international journals in legal/forensic medicine.
    Saukko P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S9-12. PubMed ID: 19269225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.