These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928322)

  • 1. Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9.
    Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Tramontano A; Kryshtafovych A
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):119-25. PubMed ID: 21928322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10.
    Monastyrskyy B; D'Andrea D; Fidelis K; Tramontano A; Kryshtafovych A
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):138-53. PubMed ID: 23760879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8.
    Ezkurdia I; Graña O; Izarzugaza JM; Tress ML
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():196-209. PubMed ID: 19714769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9.
    Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Moult J; Tramontano A; Kryshtafovych A
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(S10):107-18. PubMed ID: 21928402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the accuracy of contact and distance predictions in CASP14.
    Ruiz-Serra V; Pontes C; Milanetti E; Kryshtafovych A; Lepore R; Valencia A
    Proteins; 2021 Dec; 89(12):1888-1900. PubMed ID: 34595772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution.
    Sun HP; Huang Y; Wang XF; Zhang Y; Shen HB
    Proteins; 2015 Mar; 83(3):485-96. PubMed ID: 25524593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7.
    Izarzugaza JM; Graña O; Tress ML; Valencia A; Clarke ND
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():152-8. PubMed ID: 17671976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New encouraging developments in contact prediction: Assessment of the CASP11 results.
    Monastyrskyy B; D'Andrea D; Fidelis K; Tramontano A; Kryshtafovych A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):131-44. PubMed ID: 26474083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward an accurate prediction of inter-residue distances in proteins using 2D recursive neural networks.
    Kukic P; Mirabello C; Tradigo G; Walsh I; Veltri P; Pollastri G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jan; 15():6. PubMed ID: 24410833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A further leap of improvement in tertiary structure prediction in CASP13 prompts new routes for future assessments.
    Abriata LA; Tamò GE; Dal Peraro M
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 31344267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein Residue Contacts and Prediction Methods.
    Adhikari B; Cheng J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1415():463-76. PubMed ID: 27115648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study and benchmark of DNcon: a method for protein residue-residue contact prediction using deep networks.
    Eickholt J; Cheng J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 14(Suppl 14):S12. PubMed ID: 24267585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting residue-residue contacts using random forest models.
    Li Y; Fang Y; Fang J
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(24):3379-84. PubMed ID: 22016406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of protein disorder region predictions in CASP10.
    Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Moult J; Tramontano A; Fidelis K
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):127-37. PubMed ID: 23946100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions.
    Kinch L; Yong Shi S; Cong Q; Cheng H; Liao Y; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):59-73. PubMed ID: 21997521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protein contact prediction by integrating deep multiple sequence alignments, coevolution and machine learning.
    Adhikari B; Hou J; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):84-96. PubMed ID: 29047157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assessment of protein model-structures based on structural and functional similarities.
    Konopka BM; Nebel JC; Kotulska M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():242. PubMed ID: 22998498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A large-scale comparative assessment of methods for residue-residue contact prediction.
    Wuyun Q; Zheng W; Peng Z; Yang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Mar; 19(2):219-230. PubMed ID: 27802931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One contact for every twelve residues allows robust and accurate topology-level protein structure modeling.
    Kim DE; Dimaio F; Yu-Ruei Wang R; Song Y; Baker D
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):208-18. PubMed ID: 23900763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12.
    Lafita A; Bliven S; Kryshtafovych A; Bertoni M; Monastyrskyy B; Duarte JM; Schwede T; Capitani G
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-256. PubMed ID: 29071742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.