These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2192836)

  • 1. Studies of velocity fields and turbulence downstream of aortic valve prostheses in vitro and in vivo.
    Hasenkam JM
    Dan Med Bull; 1990 Jun; 37(3):235-49. PubMed ID: 2192836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and Laser Doppler Anemometry velocity measurements downstream of replacement heart valves: implications for in vivo assessment of prosthetic valve function.
    Fontaine AA; Heinrich RS; Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Scheidegger MB; Boesiger P; Walton SP; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 8834728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Differentiated evaluation of heart valve stenosis by expanded Bernoulli equation--in vitro studies of model stenoses].
    Wendt MO; Pohl M; Werner S; Kühnel R; Toppel D
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):686-93. PubMed ID: 8525670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the hemodynamics of several prosthetic heart valves: in vitro study.
    Modi VJ; Akutsu T
    Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():125-37. PubMed ID: 2296238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental validation of the fluid-structure interaction simulation of a bioprosthetic aortic heart valve.
    Kemp I; Dellimore K; Rodriguez R; Scheffer C; Blaine D; Weich H; Doubell A
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 23907849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro ultrasound characterization of a polyurethane trileaflet valve.
    Stewart SF; Burté F; Eidbo E; Kolff WJ; Yu LS; Clark RE
    ASAIO Trans; 1990; 36(3):M532-5. PubMed ID: 2252743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of high transvalvular to subvalvular velocity ratio early after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Cartier PA; Kon N; Johnson KG; Dumesnil JG; Doty DB;
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11805953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Sung HW; Le TN; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Quijano RC
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs.
    Kleine P; Perthel M; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Paulsen PK; Riis C; Laas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 9793855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional flow velocity quantification of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthesis by magnetic resonance imaging: surgical consideration.
    Matsue H; Sawa Y; Takahashi T; Matsumiya G; Ohtake S; Hamada S; Ueguchi T; Matsuda H
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):60-6. PubMed ID: 11805951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unstented aortic valvular prosthesis.
    Luisi VS; Reginato E; Pietrabissa R; Cicconardi S; Nardi GC
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1 Suppl 1():340-4. PubMed ID: 6336442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
    Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
    Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Modeling cardiovascular flow with a technical model].
    Köhler J
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1990; 35 Suppl 2():53-4. PubMed ID: 2224025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of enzyme activated milk for in vitro simulation of prosthetic valve thrombosis.
    Keggen LA; Black MM; Lawford PV; Hose DR; Strachan JR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 8834729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of valve holder flexibility on cavitation initiation with mechanical heart valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Lee CS; Aluri S; Chandran KB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 8834733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
    Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.