These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928362)

  • 1. Identification of esophageal cancer in the General Practice Research Database.
    Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1159-67. PubMed ID: 21928362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.
    Dregan A; Moller H; Murray-Thomas T; Gulliford MC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 22727737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries.
    Boggon R; van Staa TP; Chapman M; Gallagher AM; Hammad TA; Richards MA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Feb; 22(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 23239282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determining the predictive value of Read/OXMIS codes to identify incident acute myocardial infarction in the General Practice Research Database.
    Hammad TA; McAdams MA; Feight A; Iyasu S; Dal Pan GJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1197-201. PubMed ID: 18985705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Colorectal cancer incidence on the General Practice Research Database.
    Charlton R; Snowball J; Bloomfield K; de Vries C
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jul; 21(7):775-783. PubMed ID: 22383247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records.
    Dregan A; Grieve A; van Staa T; Gulliford MC;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Dec; 11():168. PubMed ID: 22176509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positive predictive value of computerized medical records for uncomplicated and complicated upper gastrointestinal ulcer.
    Margulis AV; García Rodríguez LA; Hernández-Díaz S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Oct; 18(10):900-9. PubMed ID: 19623573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of the accuracy of upper gastrointestinal diagnoses in Scottish Morbidity Record 1 data in Tayside.
    Dornan S; Murray FE; White G; McGilchrist MM; Evans JM; McDevitt DG; MacDonald TM
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1995 Sep; 53(5):274-9. PubMed ID: 7490198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Routine data from general practitioner's software systems - Export, analysis and preparation for research].
    Kersting M; Gierschmann A; Hauswaldt J; H-Pradier E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2010 Jun; 72(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 20491004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health care information processing: how accurate are the data?
    Chewning SJ; Nussman DS; Griffo ML; Kiebzak GM
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 9090620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the United Kingdom: results of a multi-database linkage study using the general practice research database.
    Hagberg KW; Taylor A; Hernandez RK; Jick S
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 37(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 23416031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phynx: an open source software solution supporting data management and web-based patient-level data review for drug safety studies in the general practice research database and other health care databases.
    Egbring M; Kullak-Ublick GA; Russmann S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2010 Jan; 19(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19777533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hormone therapy and coronary heart disease in young women.
    Weiner MG; Barnhart K; Xie D; Tannen RL
    Menopause; 2008; 15(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17502840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].
    Bergmann MM; Noethlings U; Eisinger B; Streller B; Quehl A; Walter D; Lahmann PH; Boeing H
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):475-81. PubMed ID: 15372347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replication of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study using a primary care medical record database prompted exploration of a new method to address unmeasured confounding.
    Weiner MG; Xie D; Tannen RL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jul; 17(7):661-70. PubMed ID: 18327857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.
    Khan NF; Harrison SE; Rose PW
    Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Mar; 60(572):e128-36. PubMed ID: 20202356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of oesophageal cancer surgery data in the Swedish Patient Registry.
    Lagergren K; Derogar M
    Acta Oncol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 22150167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Depression diagnoses and antidepressant use in primary care practices: a study from the Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet).
    Ornstein S; Stuart G; Jenkins R
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Jan; 49(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 10678342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
    Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.