These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928619)

  • 1. Volumetric lean percentage measurement using dual energy mammography.
    Ducote JL; Klopfer MJ; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4498-504. PubMed ID: 21928619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
    Ding H; Sennung D; Cho HM; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5527. PubMed ID: 27782705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast composition measurement with a cadmium-zinc-telluride based spectral computed tomography system.
    Ding H; Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1289-97. PubMed ID: 22380361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.
    Molloi S; Ducote JL; Ding H; Feig SA
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081917. PubMed ID: 25086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of breast density using dual-energy mammography with liquid phantom calibration.
    Lam AR; Ding H; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(14):3985-4000. PubMed ID: 24971873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of water and lipid density with dual-energy mammography: validation in postmortem breasts.
    Molloi S; Ding H; Cho HM; Beidokhti D
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):938-946. PubMed ID: 32845386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.
    Laidevant AD; Malkov S; Flowers CI; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 20175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration phantoms for accurate water and lipid density quantification using dual energy mammography.
    Cho HM; Ding H; Kumar N; Sennung D; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(11):4589-4603. PubMed ID: 28440226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast density quantification in dual-energy mammography using virtual anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Pacheco G; Castillo-Lopez JP; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Brandan ME
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14360. PubMed ID: 38648734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Composition analysis of pork carcasses by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG; Evock-Clover CM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Aug; 76(8):2104-14. PubMed ID: 9734860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography.
    Mou X; Chen X; Sun L; Yu H; Ji Z; Zhang L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6321-36. PubMed ID: 18936520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.
    Ghani MU; Wong MD; Wu D; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Fuh J; Wu X; Liu H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3523-3538. PubMed ID: 28379851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition.
    Landry G; Reniers B; Murrer L; Lutgens L; Gurp EB; Pignol JP; Keller B; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5188-98. PubMed ID: 21089752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
    Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual-energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Lu KM; Yeh DM; Cao BH; Lin CY; Liang CY; Zhou YB; Tsai CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):170-177. PubMed ID: 31106990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study.
    Breitenstein DS; Shaw CC
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3):137-50. PubMed ID: 9718504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference values of body composition obtained by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in preterm and term neonates.
    Rigo J; Nyamugabo K; Picaud JC; Gerard P; Pieltain C; De Curtis M
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1998 Aug; 27(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 9702651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
    Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.