387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928623)
21. The effect of model approximations on single-collision distributions of low-energy electrons in liquid water.
Emfietzoglou D; Nikjoo H
Radiat Res; 2005 Jan; 163(1):98-111. PubMed ID: 15606313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new open-source GPU-based microscopic Monte Carlo simulation tool for the calculations of DNA damages caused by ionizing radiation - Part II: sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.
Lai Y; Tsai MY; Tian Z; Qin N; Yan C; Hung SH; Chi Y; Jia X
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1971-1982. PubMed ID: 31975390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of track structure and condensed history physics models of Geant4 to nanoscale electron transport in liquid water.
Kyriakou I; Ivanchenko V; Sakata D; Bordage MC; Guatelli S; Incerti S; Emfietzoglou D
Phys Med; 2019 Feb; 58():149-154. PubMed ID: 30642767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Low-energy electron and positron transport in gases and soft-condensed systems of biological relevance.
White RD; Tattersall W; Boyle G; Robson RE; Dujko S; Petrovic ZLj; Bankovic A; Brunger MJ; Sullivan JP; Buckman SJ; Garcia G
Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Jan; 83 Pt B():77-85. PubMed ID: 23395226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study on Monte Carlo simulations of electron emission from liquid water.
Mehnaz ; Yang LH; Zou YB; Da B; Mao SF; Li HM; Zhao YF; Ding ZJ
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):759-771. PubMed ID: 31702062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Monte Carlo assessment of low energy electron range in liquid water and dosimetry effects.
Seniwal B; Mendes BM; Malano F; Pérez P; Valente M; Fonseca TCF
Phys Med; 2020 Dec; 80():363-372. PubMed ID: 33285337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microdosimetry of low-energy electrons.
Liamsuwan T; Emfietzoglou D; Uehara S; Nikjoo H
Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Dec; 88(12):899-907. PubMed ID: 22668077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Monte Carlo tools to supplement experimental microdosimetric spectra.
Chiriotti S; Moro D; Conte V; Colautti P; D'Agostino E; Sterpin E; Vynckier S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):454-8. PubMed ID: 24132390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations.
Pater P; Seuntjens J; El Naqa I; Bernal MA
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121708. PubMed ID: 25471955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simulation evaluation of NIST air-kerma rate calibration standard for electronic brachytherapy.
Hiatt JR; Rivard MJ; Hughes HG
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1119-29. PubMed ID: 26936699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of film measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of dose delivered with very high-energy electron beams in a polystyrene phantom.
Bazalova-Carter M; Liu M; Palma B; Dunning M; McCormick D; Hemsing E; Nelson J; Jobe K; Colby E; Koong AC; Tantawi S; Dolgashev V; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1606-13. PubMed ID: 25832051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Monte Carlo study of absorbed dose distributions in both the vapor and liquid phases of water by intermediate energy electrons based on different condensed-history transport schemes.
Bousis C; Emfietzoglou D; Hadjidoukas P; Nikjoo H
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(14):3739-61. PubMed ID: 18574312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between an event-by-event Monte Carlo code, NOREC, and ETRAN for electron scaled point kernels between 20 keV and 1 MeV.
Cho SH; Vassiliev ON; Horton JL
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2007 Mar; 46(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17219152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An evaluation of calculation parameters in the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo codes and their effect on surface dose calculation.
Kim JH; Hill R; Kuncic Z
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):N267-78. PubMed ID: 22750849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Doppler broadening effect on low-energy photon dose calculations using MCNP5 and PENELOPE.
Ye SJ; Ove R; Naqvi SA
Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 16966879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Monte Carlo study of cellular S-factors for 1 keV to 1 MeV electrons.
Bousis C; Emfietzoglou D; Hadjidoukas P; Nikjoo H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(16):5023-38. PubMed ID: 19652289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of nanodosimetric parameters of track structure calculated by the Monte Carlo codes Geant4-DNA and PTra.
Lazarakis P; Bug MU; Gargioni E; Guatelli S; Rabus H; Rosenfeld AB
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1231-50. PubMed ID: 22330641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV.
Hermida-López M; Lüdemann L; Flühs A; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations.
Pacilio M; Lanconelli N; Lo MS; Betti M; Montani L; Torres AL; Coca PM
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1543-52. PubMed ID: 19544770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High-speed evaluation of track-structure Monte Carlo electron transport simulations.
Pasciak AS; Ford JR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5539-53. PubMed ID: 18780958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
