These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928926)

  • 21. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The cost of being watched: Stroop interference increases under concomitant eye contact.
    Conty L; Gimmig D; Belletier C; George N; Huguet P
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 20070959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring the effects of a visual or auditory Stroop task on dual-task costs during obstacle crossing.
    Worden TA; Mendes M; Singh P; Vallis LA
    Gait Posture; 2016 Oct; 50():159-163. PubMed ID: 27621085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concurrent performance of a cognitive and dynamic obstacle avoidance task: influence of dual-task training.
    Worden TA; Vallis LA
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(5):357-68. PubMed ID: 24914575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selective influences of cross-modal spatial-cues on preattentive auditory processing: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Mathiak K; Hertrich I; Zvyagintsev M; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 16054843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory temporal preparation induced by rhythmic cues during concurrent auditory working memory tasks.
    Cutanda D; Correa Á; Sanabria D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 25893682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lateralized contribution of prefrontal cortex in controlling task-irrelevant information during verbal and spatial working memory tasks: rTMS evidence.
    Sandrini M; Rossini PM; Miniussi C
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2056-63. PubMed ID: 18336847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Turning a blind eye to temptation: how cognitive load can facilitate self-regulation.
    Van Dillen LF; Papies EK; Hofmann W
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 23276276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Release of inattentional blindness by high working memory load: elucidating the relationship between working memory and selective attention.
    de Fockert JW; Bremner AJ
    Cognition; 2011 Dec; 121(3):400-8. PubMed ID: 21937032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.
    Van der Molen MJ; Van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR; Hamel BC; Curfs LM; Ramakers GJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):720-9. PubMed ID: 21958658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors.
    Zhang P; Chen X; Yuan P; Zhang D; He S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):715-24. PubMed ID: 16956775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive requirements for vestibular and ocular motor processing in healthy adults and patients with unilateral vestibular lesions.
    Talkowski ME; Redfern MS; Jennings JR; Furman JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1432-41. PubMed ID: 16197696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects divided attention immediately after cessation of stimulation.
    Wagner M; Rihs TA; Mosimann UP; Fisch HU; Schlaepfer TE
    J Psychiatr Res; 2006 Jun; 40(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16055155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection.
    Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2012 May; 23(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 22440977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration.
    Gondan M; Blurton SP; Hughes F; Greenlee MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1887-97. PubMed ID: 21967270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.