These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928928)

  • 1. Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered.
    Davoli CC; Brockmole JR; Witt JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 21928928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of spatial contextual familiarity on remembered scenes, episodic memories, and imagined future events.
    Robin J; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):459-75. PubMed ID: 24219084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tool use and perceived distance: when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable.
    Osiurak F; Morgado N; Palluel-Germain R
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 218(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 22349562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 16243365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it.
    Witt JK; Proffitt DR; Epstein W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):880-8. PubMed ID: 16262485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual arm's reach influences perceived distances but only after experience reaching.
    Linkenauger SA; Bülthoff HH; Mohler BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():393-401. PubMed ID: 25446965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance.
    Witt JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1148-56. PubMed ID: 21500947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial representations in older adults are not modified by action: Evidence from tool use.
    Costello MC; Bloesch EK; Davoli CC; Panting ND; Abrams RA; Brockmole JR
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Sep; 30(3):656-68. PubMed ID: 26052886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remembering the past and imagining the future: examining the consequences of mental time travel on memory.
    Storm BC; Jobe TA
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 22360761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.
    Coventry KR; Valdés B; Castillo A; Guijarro-Fuentes P
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 18706538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where do you think you are? Effects of conceptual current position on spatial memory performance.
    Shelton AL; Marchette SA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):686-98. PubMed ID: 20438266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When the future becomes the past: Differences in brain activation patterns for episodic memory and episodic future thinking.
    Weiler JA; Suchan B; Daum I
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 212(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 20399235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A disruptive effect of bizarreness on memory for relational and contextual details of self-performed and other-performed acts.
    Worthen JB; Wood VV
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(4):535-46. PubMed ID: 11789339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of extrapolating a pointer into perceived and imagined space.
    Attneave F; Pierce CR
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):371-87. PubMed ID: 742660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The eyes in imagery and perceptual processes: first remarks.
    Ruggieri V; Alfieri G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Aug; 75(1):287-90. PubMed ID: 1528683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expanding angles? Systematic distortions of space involving angular figures.
    Heywood S; Chessell K
    Perception; 1977; 6(5):571-82. PubMed ID: 593790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coding of far and near space in neglect patients.
    Berti A; Smania N; Allport A
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S98-102. PubMed ID: 11373139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local spatial distortion caused by simple geometrical figures.
    Aksentijevic A; Elliott MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 27244533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual grouping and distance estimates in typical and atypical development: comparing performance across perception, drawing and construction tasks.
    Farran EK; Cole VL
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 18508173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain mechanisms of perceiving tools and imagining tool use acts: a functional MRI study.
    Wadsworth HM; Kana RK
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1863-9. PubMed ID: 21419144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.