161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928934)
1. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
Hanley JR; Hayes A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
Hanley JR; Shah N
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.
Neath I; Farley LA; Surprenant AM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1269-78; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store?
Jones DM; Macken WJ; Nicholls AP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):656-74. PubMed ID: 15099134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory.
Norris D; Baddeley AD; Page MP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1093-105. PubMed ID: 15355138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
Eagan DE; Chein JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for a "perceptual-gestural" alternative.
Baddeley AD; Larsen JD
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 17455059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
Hall D; Gathercole SE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?
Hanley JR
Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
Saito S; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.
Beaman CP; Jones DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 9745380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
