These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21928934)

  • 1. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
    Hanley JR; Shah N
    Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.
    Neath I; Farley LA; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1269-78; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store?
    Jones DM; Macken WJ; Nicholls AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):656-74. PubMed ID: 15099134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retroactive effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall from short-term memory.
    Norris D; Baddeley AD; Page MP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1093-105. PubMed ID: 15355138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overlap of phonetic features as a determinant of the between-stream phonological similarity effect.
    Eagan DE; Chein JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 21928935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
    Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The phonological loop unmasked? A comment on the evidence for a "perceptual-gestural" alternative.
    Baddeley AD; Larsen JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 17455059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
    Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
    Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
    Hall D; Gathercole SE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?
    Hanley JR
    Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
    Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.
    Beaman CP; Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 9745380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.