These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21929666)

  • 1. Piéron's Law holds during stroop conflict: insights into the architecture of decision making.
    Stafford T; Ingram L; Gurney KN
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1553-66. PubMed ID: 21929666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conflict tasks and the diffusion framework: Insight in model constraints based on psychological laws.
    Servant M; Montagnini A; Burle B
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jul; 72():162-95. PubMed ID: 24762975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Piéron's Law and Optimal Behavior in Perceptual Decision-Making.
    van Maanen L; Grasman RP; Forstmann BU; Wagenmakers EJ
    Front Neurosci; 2012; 5():143. PubMed ID: 22232572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 1/falpha noise in reaction times: a proposed model based on Piéron's law and information processing.
    Medina JM
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Jan; 79(1 Pt 1):011902. PubMed ID: 19257064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additive factors do not imply discrete processing stages: a worked example using models of the stroop task.
    Stafford T; Gurney KN
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():287. PubMed ID: 22102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.
    Stafford T; Gurney KN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):975-87. PubMed ID: 15875968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron's law and choice reaction time.
    Pins D; Bonnet C
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):390-400. PubMed ID: 8935900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision.
    Palmer J; Huk AC; Shadlen MN
    J Vis; 2005 May; 5(5):376-404. PubMed ID: 16097871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. S-cone excitation ratios for reaction times to blue-yellow suprathreshold changes at isoluminance.
    Medina JM; Díaz JA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 20883334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The model of attention dynamics in perception].
    Glasko AV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(6):738-54; discussion 755-6. PubMed ID: 19178076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for top-down control of eye movements during visual decision making.
    Glaholt MG; Wu MC; Reingold EM
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):15. PubMed ID: 20616137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.
    Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test sequence priming in recognition memory.
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1162-74. PubMed ID: 19686012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal integration of sensory evidence for saccade target selection.
    Ludwig CJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2764-73. PubMed ID: 19686771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task switching as a two-stage decision process.
    Sinha N; Brown JT; Carpenter RH
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 May; 95(5):3146-53. PubMed ID: 16467422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bivalency effect in task switching: general and enduring.
    Meier B; Woodward TS; Rey-Mermet A; Graf P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 19739903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A sensory origin for color-word stroop effects in aging: simulating age-related changes in color-vision mimics age-related changes in Stroop.
    Ben-David BM; Schneider BA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 Nov; 17(6):730-46. PubMed ID: 21058053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.