These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2192990)
1. The theoretical and practical application of a remoldable craniomandibular appliance. Ahlin JH Int J Orthod; 1990; 28(1-2):5-7. PubMed ID: 2192990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The theoretical and practical application of a remoldable craniomandibular appliance. Ahlin JH Int J Orthod; 1984; 22(2-3):21-3. PubMed ID: 6595233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical application of the mandibular protraction appliance in upper lateral agenesy and in asymmetric cases. Coelho Filho CM Tex Dent J; 2002 Jul; 119(7):618-26. PubMed ID: 12138534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a remoldable appliance for diagnosis and treatment of craniomandibular disorders: two case reports. Ahlin JH Funct Orthod; 1985; 2(3):31-5. PubMed ID: 3861468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Expand your practice--adult expansion. Lowry M Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2007; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 17441617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abnormal function of the temporomandibular joints and related musculature. Orthodontic implications. Part I. Thompson JR Angle Orthod; 1986 Apr; 56(2):143-63. PubMed ID: 3458399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion. Rondeau B J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Class II skeletal treatment- orthopedic repositioning with the supermarionator. Gonzalez B Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):25-9. PubMed ID: 21314085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lars treatment in the meso- to dolichofacial patient in the presence of internal derangement. Williamson EH Facial Orthop Temporomandibular Arthrol; 1987 Jul; 4(7):3-7. PubMed ID: 3476312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective cephalometric study of the effects of the Harvold appliance in the treatment of 20 patients with a Class II division 1 malocclusion. McNamara CM J Ir Dent Assoc; 1989; 35(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 2634713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Case report: craniofacial pain - skeletal Class II previous retraction orthodontics. Lynn JM Funct Orthod; 1989; 6(6):11-6. PubMed ID: 2639851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MARA appliance. Rondeau B Funct Orthod; 2002; 19(2):4-12, 14-6. PubMed ID: 12192852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a new fixed functional appliance for treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion first report. Kinzinger G; Ostheimer J; Förster F; Kwandt PB; Reul H; Diedrich P J Orofac Orthop; 2002 Sep; 63(5):384-99. PubMed ID: 12297967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Intercepted orthopedic treatment of skeletal maxillary protrusion deformity]. Zhou XK Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1989 Jul; 24(4):208-11, 254-5. PubMed ID: 2517093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Levandoski splint vs. the sagittal II appliance in TMJ treatment: a functional face off! Spahl TJ Funct Orthod; 1991; 8(3):4, 6, 8. PubMed ID: 1810843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal Class II treatment with the Chateau appliance. Craig WH; Petit HP; Chateau M J Pedod; 1987; 11(2):120-38. PubMed ID: 3546662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]