86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21931232)
21. Toward a zoocentric animal ethics.
Rossi J
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):50-2. PubMed ID: 18726783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Inner turmoil: an important consideration in conflicts of interest.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 8750598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: disclosing individual results of genetic research.
Manolio TA
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):32-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Ethics, embryos, and eggs: the need for more than epistemic values.
de Melo-MartÃn I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(12):38-40. PubMed ID: 19085473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The moral foundations of equipoise and its role in international research.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):48-51; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Embryological viability.
Baylis F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):17-8; discussion W10-3. PubMed ID: 16282103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Does uncle Sam really want you? A response to "Rethinking research Ethics" by Rosamond Rhodes (AJOB 5:1).
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W22-3. PubMed ID: 16036645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Do family doctors have an obligation to facilitate research?
Ives J; Draper H; Damery S; Wilson S
Fam Pract; 2009 Dec; 26(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 19589883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Striking the right balance in research ethics and regulation.
Miller FG
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):65. PubMed ID: 20694916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
Fernandez CV; Weijer C
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An ethical model for improving the patient-physician relationship.
McCullough LB
Inquiry; 1988; 25(4):454-68. PubMed ID: 2976047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proposal for patient obligations for access to unapproved medical interventions: both too much and not enough.
Chapman A
Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(11):25-6. PubMed ID: 25325807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Vulnerability: a needed moral safeguard.
DeMarco JP
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):82-4; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ethical genetic research on human subjects.
Harris J
Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():77-91. PubMed ID: 16285118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical ethics versus clinical research.
Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):53-5; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Aping political science.
Lunstroth J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 May; 9(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 19396673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
