128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21931961)
1. Short-duration transient visual evoked potential for objective measurement of refractive errors.
Anand A; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Tello C
Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 21931961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.
Tello C; De Moraes CG; Prata TS; Derr P; Patel J; Siegfried J; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Jun; 120(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 20111979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alteration in pattern reversal visual evoked potential in pediatric population with amblyopia and spherical refractive errors.
Agrawal A; Puthalath AS; Mittal SK; Mittal S; Singh Y; Singh A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1727-1731. PubMed ID: 35502061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evoked potentials in diagnosis of visual dysfunction in amateur boxers.
Lesiakowski P; Lubiński W; Zwierko T
Phys Sportsmed; 2018 Nov; 46(4):449-459. PubMed ID: 29973091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical application of visual evoked potentials in evaluation of the visual system in cerebral palsy. Studies on different modes of stimulation].
Galas-Zgorzalewicz B; Zgorzalewicz-Stachowiak M; Bartkowiak Z
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(9):702-5. PubMed ID: 21387808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High test-retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months.
Sarnthein J; Andersson M; Zimmermann MB; Zumsteg D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 120(10):1835-40. PubMed ID: 19762276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between the visual evoked potential and the gamma band investigated by blind and semi-blind methods.
Porcaro C; Ostwald D; Hadjipapas A; Barnes GR; Bagshaw AP
Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1059-71. PubMed ID: 21396460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity and specificity of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials (SD-tVEP) in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes.
Pillai C; Ritch R; Derr P; Gonzalez A; Kopko Cox L; Siegfried J; Liebmann JM; Tello C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2847-52. PubMed ID: 23513061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-Trial Visual Evoked Potential Extraction Using Partial Least-Squares-Based Approach.
Kristina Yanti D; Zuki Yusoff M; Sagayan Asirvadam V
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Jan; 20(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 25376049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the prolongation latency of visual evoked potentials a pathological sign in children with Down's syndrome without ocular abnormalities? Case-control study of children with Down's syndrome.
Utrobičić DK; Karlica H; Jerončić A; Borjan I; Mudnić I
BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 37278422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of refractive errors on visual evoked magnetic fields.
Suzuki M; Nagae M; Nagata Y; Kumagai N; Inui K; Kakigi R
BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 15():162. PubMed ID: 26553029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 32-channel mouse EEG: Visual evoked potentials.
Land R; Kapche A; Ebbers L; Kral A
J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Sep; 325():108316. PubMed ID: 31251949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.
di Summa A; Fusina S; Bertolasi L; Vicentini S; Perlini S; Bongiovanni LG; Polo A
Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 10947000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of spectral filters on VEP and alpha-wave responses.
Willeford KT; Fimreite V; Ciuffreda KJ
J Optom; 2016; 9(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 26293969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults.
Dotto PF; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Rocha DM; Salomão SR
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 28560498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of refractive outcomes after implantation of two types of intraocular lenses with different diopter intervals (0.25 diopter versus 0.50 diopter).
Kim M; Eom Y; Song JS; Kim HM
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):176. PubMed ID: 30021633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normalization of visual evoked potentials using underlying electroencephalogram levels improves amplitude reproducibility in rats.
You Y; Thie J; Klistorner A; Gupta VK; Graham SL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1473-8. PubMed ID: 22297498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Color Doppler imaging and pattern visual evoked potential in normal tension glaucoma and hypertension glaucoma.
Zhong Y; Min Y; Jiang Y; Cheng Y; Qin J; Shen X
Doc Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 119(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 19756801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binocular interaction in normal vision studied by pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEPS).
di Summa A; Polo A; Tinazzi M; Zanette G; Bertolasi L; Bongiovanni LG; Fiaschi A
Ital J Neurol Sci; 1997 Apr; 18(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9239527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplitude of Accommodation in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Küçük B; Hamamcı M; Aslan Bayhan S; Bayhan HA; Inan LE
Curr Eye Res; 2019 Nov; 44(11):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 31172825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]