These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21932292)

  • 1. A new perspective on the Dunnett procedure: filling the gap between NOEC/LOEC and ECx concepts.
    Delignette-Muller ML; Forfait C; Billoir E; Charles S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Dec; 30(12):2888-91. PubMed ID: 21932292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time to get off the fence: the need for definitive international guidance on statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.
    van Dam RA; Harford AJ; Warne MS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 22308052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bad habits die hard: the NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology.
    Jager T
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Feb; 31(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 22095471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative robustness of NOEC and ECx against large uncertainties in data.
    Tanaka Y; Nakamura K; Yokomizo H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206901. PubMed ID: 30485303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH.
    Williams ES; Berninger JP; Brooks BW
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Aug; 30(8):1943-54. PubMed ID: 21590796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation and comparison of the relationship between NOEC and EC10 or EC20 values in chronic Daphnia toxicity testing.
    Beasley A; Belanger SE; Brill JL; Otter RR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Oct; 34(10):2378-84. PubMed ID: 26033640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reluctant comment on Fox et al. (2012): On being dragged into the NOEC squabble.
    Newman MC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Oct; 8(4):767. PubMed ID: 22987525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NOEC: notable oversight of enlightened Canadians: a response to van Dam et al. (2012).
    Van der Vliet L; Taylor LN; Scroggins R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):397-8; author reply 399-400. PubMed ID: 22707418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests.
    Isnard P; Flammarion P; Roman G; Babut M; Bastien P; Bintein S; Esserméant L; Férard JF; Gallotti-Schmitt S; Saouter E; Saroli M; Thiébaud H; Tomassone R; Vindimian E
    Chemosphere; 2001 Nov; 45(4-5):659-69. PubMed ID: 11680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The drive to ban the NOEC/LOEC in favor of ECx is misguided and misinformed.
    Green JW; Springer TA; Staveley JP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 22991182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NOEC and LOEC as merely concessive expedients: two unambiguous alternatives and some criteria to maximize the efficiency of dose-response experimental designs.
    Murado MA; Prieto MA
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Sep; 461-462():576-86. PubMed ID: 23756217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing ecotoxicological effect concentrations of chemicals established in multi-species vs. single-species toxicity test systems.
    De Laender F; De Schamphelaere KA; Vanrolleghem PA; Janssen CR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 18774172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results from a round robin test for the ecotoxicological evaluation of construction products using two leaching tests and an aquatic test battery.
    Gartiser S; Heisterkamp I; Schoknecht U; Burkhardt M; Ratte M; Ilvonen O; Brauer F; Brückmann J; Dabrunz A; Egeler P; Eisl AM; Feiler U; Fritz I; König S; Lebertz H; Pandard P; Pötschke G; Scheerbaum D; Schreiber F; Soldán P; Weiß R; Weltens R
    Chemosphere; 2017 May; 175():138-146. PubMed ID: 28211327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clustering pesticides according to their molecular properties, fate, and effects by considering additional ecotoxicological parameters in the TyPol method.
    Traoré H; Crouzet O; Mamy L; Sireyjol C; Rossard V; Servien R; Latrille E; Martin-Laurent F; Patureau D; Benoit P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(5):4728-4738. PubMed ID: 29197062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the ECx a legitimate surrogate for a NOEC?
    Fox DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):351-3. PubMed ID: 19645096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival data analyses in ecotoxicology: critical effect concentrations, methods and models. What should we use?
    Forfait-Dubuc C; Charles S; Billoir E; Delignette-Muller ML
    Ecotoxicology; 2012 May; 21(4):1072-83. PubMed ID: 22302371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora's Box?
    Kefford BJ; Zalizniak L; Warne MS; Nugegoda D
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Feb; 151(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 17559995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proposing a vigorous hybrid of the LOEC and ECx.
    deBruyn AM; Elphick JR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Apr; 9(2):345-7. PubMed ID: 23529808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing uncertainty in environmental risk assessment (ERA): clearly defining acute and chronic toxicity tests.
    Hahn T; Stauber J; Dobson S; Howe P; Kielhorn J; Koennecker G; Diamond J; Lee-Steere C; Schneider U; Sugaya Y; Taylor K; Van Dam R; Mangelsdorf I
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 19132815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the artificial sweetener sucralose on Daphnia magna and Americamysis bahia survival, growth and reproduction.
    Huggett DB; Stoddard KI
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2011 Oct; 49(10):2575-9. PubMed ID: 21742009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.