BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2193268)

  • 1. Doppler recordings of fetal movement: II. Comparison with maternal perception.
    Johnson TR; Jordan ET; Paine LL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 2193268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of fetal movement using Doppler ultrasound.
    Wheeler T; Roberts K; Peters J; Murrills A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 70(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 3299185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Monitoring fetal movements using the Doppler-Fizeau effect with a new apparatus: the Tococinon].
    Colette C; Anguenot M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984; 13(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 6384349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quantitative studies on maternal perception of fetal movement with two ultrasonic real-time scanners].
    Hara K; Jimbo T
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Oct; 36(10):1907-12. PubMed ID: 6389729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method for long-term home monitoring of fetal movement by pregnant women themselves.
    Ryo E; Nishihara K; Matsumoto S; Kamata H
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jun; 34(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 21962570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal perception of foetal movement compared with movement detected by real-time ultrasound: an exploratory study.
    Hijazi ZR; Callan SE; East CE
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 50(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 20522070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [An evaluation of fetal movement during non stress testing (author's transl)].
    Sakakibara S; Chiba Y; Aoki M; Hasegawa T; Sasaki K; Kin S; Kurachi K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Dec; 33(12):2026-32. PubMed ID: 7338657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting maternal perception of fetal movement.
    Hijazi ZR; East CE
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2009 Jul; 64(7):489-97; quiz 499. PubMed ID: 19545457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal movement monitoring: clinical application.
    Baskett TF; Liston RM
    Clin Perinatol; 1989 Sep; 16(3):613-25. PubMed ID: 2673611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of the Hewlett-Packard actograph in detecting fetal movements.
    de Wit AC; Nijhuis JG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Aug; 22(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 12905509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The maternal perception of fetal movements during the last trimester of pregnancy].
    Schmidt W; Cseh I; Hara K; Neusinger J; Kubli F
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Nov; 42(11):798-802. PubMed ID: 6924911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [New ultrasonic Doppler fetal actograph and continuous recording of fetal movement].
    Maeda K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Feb; 36(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 6699457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ante partum monitoring of fetal status by maternal recording of fetal movement].
    Radivojevic K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 May; 50(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 2373332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doppler recording of fetal movement: clinical correlation with real-time ultrasound.
    Besinger RE; Johnson TR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Aug; 74(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 2664613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal perception of fetal movements in late pregnancy is affected by type and duration of fetal movement.
    Brown R; Higgins LE; Johnstone ED; Wijekoon JH; Heazell AE
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(13):2145-50. PubMed ID: 26364651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise.
    Heazell AE; Frøen JF
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Feb; 28(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18393008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time quantified detection of fetal movements using a new fetal movement algorithm.
    Lowery CL; Russell WA; Baggot PJ; Wilson JD; Walls RC; Bentz LS; Murphy P
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 Jan; 14(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9259889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fetal development and well-being with ultrasonic Doppler fetal actocardiogram.
    Maeda K; Tatsumura M; Minagawa Y; Ohta T; Ida T; Nagata N
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(14):873-9. PubMed ID: 3310455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.