196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21933558)
1. Accuracy of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in healthy term neonates during postnatal circulatory adaptation.
He SR; Zhang C; Liu YM; Sun YX; Zhuang J; Chen JM; Madigan VM; Smith BE; Sun X
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Aug; 124(15):2284-9. PubMed ID: 21933558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical study of neonatal cardiac output measurement methods].
Zheng ML; Sun X; Zhong J; He SR; Pan W; Pang CC; Sun YX; Liu YM
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23527933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of systemic oxygen delivery and inotropy in healthy term neonates with the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM).
He SR; Sun X; Zhang C; Jian Z; Sun YX; Zheng ML; Liu YM; Madigan VM; Smith BE
Early Hum Dev; 2013 May; 89(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 23164929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic evaluation in preterm infants using ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM).
Doni D; Faraguna MC; Zannin E; Rinaldi A; Cafolla C; Iozzi L; Cavalleri V; Rigotti C; Sinelli M; Fedeli T; Ventura ML
Eur J Pediatr; 2024 May; 183(5):2183-2192. PubMed ID: 38376594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of preclinical cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance in HEMS in thoracic pain--the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor.
Knobloch K; Hubrich V; Rohmann P; Lupkemann M; Gerich T; Krettek C; Phillips R
Air Med J; 2006; 25(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 17071416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Left and right ventricular cardiac outputs in early neonatal periods examined using Doppler echocardiography].
Shiraishi H; Endoh H; Ichihashi K; Kuramatsu T; Yano S; Yanagisawa M
J Cardiol; 1988 Dec; 18(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 3267721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance: Clinical assessment compared with a noninvasive objective measurement in children with shock.
Razavi A; Newth CJL; Khemani RG; Beltramo F; Ross PA
J Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 39():6-10. PubMed ID: 28088009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (ultrasonic cardiac output monitor) for cardiac output measurements in neonates.
Meyer S; Todd D; Shadboldt B
J Paediatr Child Health; 2009; 45(7-8):464-8. PubMed ID: 19712182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unreliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output in piglets simulating acute hemorrhagic shock and rapid volume expansion.
Lee CH; Wang JY; Huang KL; Chiu HW; Fei TC; Chen TS; Chang H
J Trauma; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1357-61. PubMed ID: 20539180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in exercise testing.
Knobloch K; Hoeltke V; Jakob E; Vogt PM; Phillips R
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 126(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 17467085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography.
Fellahi JL; Caille V; Charron C; Deschamps-Berger PH; Vieillard-Baron A
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1553-9. PubMed ID: 19372335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.
McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of an Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor as a Bedside Tool for Pediatric Patients.
Beltramo F; Menteer J; Razavi A; Khemani RG; Szmuszkovicz J; Newth CJ; Ross PA
Pediatr Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 26364291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac output measurement in newborn infants using the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: an assessment of agreement with conventional echocardiography, repeatability and new user experience.
Patel N; Dodsworth M; Mills JF
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2011 May; 96(3):F206-11. PubMed ID: 20605971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypertonic-hyperoncotic solutions improve cardiac function in children after open-heart surgery.
Schroth M; Plank C; Meissner U; Eberle KP; Weyand M; Cesnjevar R; Dötsch J; Rascher W
Pediatrics; 2006 Jul; 118(1):e76-84. PubMed ID: 16751617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac Output Measurement Using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor: A Validation Study in Newborn Infants.
Fraga MV; Dysart KC; Rintoul N; Chaudhary AS; Ratcliffe SJ; Fedec A; Kren S; Cohen MS; Kirpalani H
Neonatology; 2019; 116(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31326967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
