167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2193399)
1. The untold story of HUT78.
Rubinstein E
Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4962):1499-507. PubMed ID: 2193399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Inside the Gallo probe.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4962):1494-8. PubMed ID: 2193398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI.
Anderson C
Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Gallo challenged on HIV isolates.
Palca J
Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1306. PubMed ID: 2003216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Verdicts' are in on the Gallo probe.
Palca J
Science; 1992 May; 256(5058):735-8. PubMed ID: 1589751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What next in the Gallo case?
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):944-5. PubMed ID: 1948080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HHS: Gallo guilty of misconduct.
Cohen J
Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):168-70. PubMed ID: 8380653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Gallo case.
Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6294):602. PubMed ID: 2170851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assumptions of AIDS inquiry challenged.
Concar D; Anderson C
Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6288):3. PubMed ID: 2203966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gallo vs Montagnier?
Nature; 1991 Jun; 351(6326):426. PubMed ID: 2046740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientists get mad at OSI. Richards Panel: out of the loop?
Palca J
Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1606-7. PubMed ID: 2047866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
Hilts P
N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pinning down Gallo's virus.
Norman C
Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4994):619. PubMed ID: 1992514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
Greenberg D
Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
Greenberg DS
Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH "confused" about ethics rules.
Rhein R
BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6798):329-30. PubMed ID: 1912771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should AIDS research be regulated? A Manhattan Project for AIDS and other policy proposals.
Salbu SR
Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(2):425-75. PubMed ID: 11652751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dingell rips Healy for 'obstructionism'.
Cohen J
Science; 1992 Dec; 258(5089):1729. PubMed ID: 1465608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
