BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21935368)

  • 1. An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Fuggetta G; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23957. PubMed ID: 21935368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.
    Almabruk AA; Paterson KB; McGowan V; Jordan TR
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18131. PubMed ID: 21559084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual speech perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision: further implications for divisions in hemispheric projections.
    Jordan TR; Sheen M; Abedipour L; Paterson KB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e98273. PubMed ID: 25032950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: the evidence from Arabic.
    Jordan TR; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 21457952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid categorization of foveal and extrafoveal natural images: associated ERPs and effects of lateralization.
    Fize D; Fabre-Thorpe M; Richard G; Doyon B; Thorpe SJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov; 59(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 16098651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parafoveal-on-foveal repetition effects in sentence reading: A co-registered eye-tracking and electroencephalogram study.
    Mirault J; Yeaton J; Broqua F; Dufau S; Holcomb PJ; Grainger J
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Aug; 57(8):e13553. PubMed ID: 32091627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition.
    Hsiao JH; Shillcock R; Lee CY
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1280-92. PubMed ID: 17098263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different hemispheric specialization for face/word recognition: A high-density ERP study with hemifield visual stimulation.
    Takamiya N; Maekawa T; Yamasaki T; Ogata K; Yamada E; Tanaka M; Tobimatsu S
    Brain Behav; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e01649. PubMed ID: 32367678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
    Bernard JB; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An ERP investigation of the co-development of hemispheric lateralization of face and word recognition.
    Dundas EM; Plaut DC; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():315-23. PubMed ID: 24933662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
    McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.