208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21935687)
1. Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.
He Z; Qiao H; Zhou W; Wang Y; Xu Z; Che X; Zhang J; Liang W
J Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 21935687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The pleth variability index as an indicator of the central extracellular fluid volume in mechanically ventilated patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with initial distribution volume of glucose.
Lu W; Dong J; Xu Z; Shen H; Zheng J
Med Sci Monit; 2014 Mar; 20():386-92. PubMed ID: 24608263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
Kim KM; Kim GS; Han M
Singapore Med J; 2022 Dec; 63(12):731-739. PubMed ID: 34911180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor.
Durga P; Jonnavittula N; Muthuchellappan R; Ramachandran G
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 19295396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.
Lee JH; Kim JT; Yoon SZ; Lim YJ; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Kim CS
Br J Anaesth; 2007 Sep; 99(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 17621598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of volume response under open-chest conditions during coronary artery bypass surgery.
Sander M; Spies CD; Berger K; Grubitzsch H; Foer A; Krämer M; Carl M; von Heymann C
Crit Care; 2007; 11(6):R121. PubMed ID: 18034888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.
Renner J; Broch O; Duetschke P; Scheewe J; Höcker J; Moseby M; Jung O; Bein B
Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22113930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload.
Trepte CJ; Haas SA; Nitzschke R; Salzwedel C; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23972740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The comparison between stroke volume variation and filling pressure as an estimate of right ventricular preload in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Toyoda D; Fukuda M; Iwasaki R; Terada T; Sato N; Ochiai R; Kotake Y
J Anesth; 2015 Feb; 29(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24962946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of fluid resuscitation on the effective circulating volume in patients undergoing liver surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Vos JJ; Kalmar AF; Hendriks HGD; Bakker J; Scheeren TWL
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 28210935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.
Muller L; Louart G; Bousquet PJ; Candela D; Zoric L; de La Coussaye JE; Jaber S; Lefrant JY
Intensive Care Med; 2010 Mar; 36(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 19847400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliably predict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients.
Broch O; Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Höcker J; Schöttler J; Steinfath M; Bein B
J Crit Care; 2012 Jun; 27(3):325.e7-13. PubMed ID: 21855280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observations on significant hemodynamic changes caused by a high concentration of epidurally administered ropivacaine: correlation and prediction study of stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in thoracic epidural anesthesia.
Hong JM; Lee HJ; Oh YJ; Cho AR; Kim HJ; Lee DW; Do WS; Kwon JY; Kim H
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):153. PubMed ID: 29145824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
Preisman S; Kogan S; Berkenstadt H; Perel A
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Dec; 95(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 16286349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
