These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
836 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21935774)
1. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates]. Acuner IC; Bayramoğlu G; Birinci A; Cekiç Cihan C; Bek Y; Durupınar B Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Steward CD; Mohammed JM; Swenson JM; Stocker SA; Williams PP; Gaynes RP; McGowan JE; Tenover FC J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 41(1):351-8. PubMed ID: 12517872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Shall we report the carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii strains detected by BD Phoenix system?]. Oğünç D; Ongüt G; Ozen NS; Baysan BO; Günseren F; Dağlar D; Demirbakan H; Gültekin M Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Apr; 44(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 20549953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility at a University teaching hospital in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Kassim A; Omuse G; Premji Z; Revathi G Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2016 Apr; 15():21. PubMed ID: 27068515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting doripenem susceptibility based on meropenem and imipenem interpretation for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Hagihara M; Kuti JL; Nicolau DP Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Mar; 72(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 22209563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Vitek 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with Vitek 2 (2009 FDA) and CLSI M100S 26th Edition Breakpoints. Bobenchik AM; Deak E; Hindler JA; Charlton CL; Humphries RM J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 55(2):450-456. PubMed ID: 27881616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 500 gram negative isolates to determine the number of major susceptibility interpretation discrepancies between the Vitek and MicroScan Walkaway for 9 antimicrobial agents. Rittenhouse SF; Miller LA; Utrup LJ; Poupard JA Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Sep; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8950521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Micronaut Merlin automated broth microtiter system with the standard agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of mucoid and nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Balke B; Hoy L; Weissbrodt H; Häussler S Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Oct; 23(10):765-71. PubMed ID: 15605183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins. van der Heijden IM; Levin AS; De Pedri EH; Fung L; Rossi F; Duboc G; Barone AA; Costa SF Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2007 Aug; 6():8. PubMed ID: 17697363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of three automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against five broad-spectrum beta-lactam agents. Sader HS; Fritsche TR; Jones RN J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):1101-4. PubMed ID: 16517904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the bioMérieux Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing system with 11 antimicrobial agents versus members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Doern GV; Brueggemann AB; Perla R; Daly J; Halkias D; Jones RN; Saubolle MA J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Aug; 35(8):2115-9. PubMed ID: 9230393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for the identification and susceptibility testing of three species of nonfermenting gram-negative rods frequently isolated from clinical samples. Joyanes P; del Carmen Conejo M; Martínez-Martínez L; Perea EJ J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Sep; 39(9):3247-53. PubMed ID: 11526158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of disk diffusion test for carbapenem sensitivity in Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains]. Akan OA; Uysal S Mikrobiyol Bul; 2005 Jul; 39(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 16358486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]