BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21936433)

  • 1. High-level adoption of electronic health records.
    Campion FX; Richter JM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2011; 27(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 21936433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?
    Simon SR; McCarthy ML; Kaushal R; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Poon EG; Yee KC; Orav EJ; Williams DH; Bates DW
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Feb; 14(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18211642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overcoming barriers to EHR adoption.
    Haughom J; Kriz S; McMillan DR
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2011 Jul; 65(7):96-100. PubMed ID: 21789950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.
    Jha AK; Ferris TG; Donelan K; DesRoches C; Shields A; Rosenbaum S; Blumenthal D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w496-507. PubMed ID: 17035341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Abdolrasulnia M; Menachemi N; Shewchuk RM; Ginter PM; Duncan WJ; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18580304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. At the crossroads: NRTRC white paper examines trends driving the convergence of telehealth, EHRs and HIE.
    Thielst CB
    World Hosp Health Serv; 2010; 46(4):17-23. PubMed ID: 21391447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of the utilization of an installed electronic health record.
    Dullabh P; Moiduddin A; Babalola E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20841654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records.
    Jha AK; Burke MF; DesRoches C; Joshi MS; Kralovec PD; Campbell EG; Buntin MB
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Dec; 17(12 Spec No.):SP117-24. PubMed ID: 22216770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and implementation of a standards-based interoperable clinical decision support architecture in the context of the Korean EHR.
    Cho I; Kim J; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim Y
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Sep; 79(9):611-22. PubMed ID: 20620098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between usage intention and adoption of electronic health records at primary care clinics.
    Iqbal U; Ho CH; Li YC; Nguyen PA; Jian WS; Wen HC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Dec; 112(3):731-7. PubMed ID: 24091088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey.
    Simon SR; Kaushal R; Cleary PD; Jenter CA; Volk LA; Orav EJ; Burdick E; Poon EG; Bates DW
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17353500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring use of electronic health record functionality using system audit information.
    Bowes WA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20841655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using technology to promote gastrointestinal outcomes research: a case for electronic health records.
    Atreja A; Achkar JP; Jain AK; Harris CM; Lashner BA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Sep; 103(9):2171-8. PubMed ID: 18844611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interface terminologies: bridging the gap between theory and reality for Africa.
    Kanter AS; Wang AY; Masarie FE; Naeymi-Rad F; Safran C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():27-32. PubMed ID: 18487703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using electronic prescribing transaction data to estimate electronic health record adoption.
    Maxson ER; Buntin MJ; Mostashari F
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):e320-6. PubMed ID: 21322303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record.
    Westra BL; Delaney CW; Konicek D; Keenan G
    Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(5):258-266.e1. PubMed ID: 18922281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communication and documentation considerations for electronic health records.
    Gaffey AD
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2009; 29(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 19908648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Avoiding the trap in the HITECH Act's incentive timeframe for implementing the EHR.
    Tomes JP
    J Health Care Finance; 2010; 37(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 20973376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers to the adoption of electronic health records: using concept mapping to develop a comprehensive empirical model.
    Vishwanath A; Scamurra SD
    Health Informatics J; 2007 Jun; 13(2):119-34. PubMed ID: 17510224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perfect storm for electronic health records.
    Halamka J
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 16903658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.