These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21936510)

  • 1. SERAPhiC: a benchmark for in silico fragment-based drug design.
    Favia AD; Bottegoni G; Nobeli I; Bisignano P; Cavalli A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2882-96. PubMed ID: 21936510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SKATE: a docking program that decouples systematic sampling from scoring.
    Feng JA; Marshall GR
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Nov; 31(14):2540-54. PubMed ID: 20740553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational approach to de novo discovery of fragment binding for novel protein states.
    Konteatis ZD; Klon AE; Zou J; Meshkat S
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 493():357-80. PubMed ID: 21371598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual fragment docking by Glide: a validation study on 190 protein-fragment complexes.
    Sándor M; Kiss R; Keseru GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1165-72. PubMed ID: 20459088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ensemble performance index: an improved measure for assessing ensemble pose prediction performance.
    Korb O; McCabe P; Cole J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2915-9. PubMed ID: 21962010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DrugPred: a structure-based approach to predict protein druggability developed using an extensive nonredundant data set.
    Krasowski A; Muthas D; Sarkar A; Schmitt S; Brenk R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Nov; 51(11):2829-42. PubMed ID: 21995295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking.
    Gao Y; Douguet D; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 17803215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AClAP, Autonomous hierarchical agglomerative Cluster Analysis based protocol to partition conformational datasets.
    Bottegoni G; Rocchia W; Recanatini M; Cavalli A
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e58-65. PubMed ID: 16873522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking.
    Yang JM; Chen CC
    Proteins; 2004 May; 55(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 15048822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating intermolecular distance into protein-protein docking.
    Lei H; Duan Y
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Dec; 17(12):837-45. PubMed ID: 15713781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 1. Compilation of the test set.
    Li Y; Liu Z; Li J; Han L; Liu J; Zhao Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1700-16. PubMed ID: 24716849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases).
    Hu L; Benson ML; Smith RD; Lerner MG; Carlson HA
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 15971202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CREDO: a protein-ligand interaction database for drug discovery.
    Schreyer A; Blundell T
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Feb; 73(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 19207418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility.
    Davis IW; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 385(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 19041878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A protein-RNA docking benchmark (II): extended set from experimental and homology modeling data.
    Pérez-Cano L; Jiménez-García B; Fernández-Recio J
    Proteins; 2012 Jul; 80(7):1872-82. PubMed ID: 22488990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.